<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cieulyyy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cieulyyy</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cieulyyy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cieulyyy in "Discovering hard disk physical geometry through microbenchmarking (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this takes me back. i used to work on storage performance and understanding the difference between logical and physical geometry was crucial for aligning partitions correctly. modern drives do a lot of remapping internally so the old approaches don't apply the same way anymore.<p>one thing the article doesn't really touch on is how trim/discard interacts with the physical layout on ssds. would be interesting to see a followup on that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 06:54:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48005478</link><dc:creator>cieulyyy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48005478</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48005478</guid></item></channel></rss>