The Free Software Foundation sometimes went further than the Apache Foundation with their About dialog or textual notices for end users, so they would learn about their affirmative rights. The purpose of this "prominent but reasonable" preservation requirement is to retain this end user advocacy. Specifically, the GPL copyright contains a prologue which the FSF wished to broadly distribute. This badgeware stuff is a decade old abuse of this end user advocacy strategy.

An otherwise permissive license with a prominent but symmetric end user notification might be a helpful addition to OSI license options, but care is needed so it is compatible with GPLv3, reasonable to textual or embedded environments, and precludes stupid badgeware nonsense. Standard approaches and bill of materials could improve the state of the art.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663533

Points: 5

# Comments: 1

At least with free software licenses we can separate the copyrights from the trademarks, and exercise the right to fork if a trademark owner is captured and misbehaves.

Consider being a platform coop with regional operators as members. See https://platform.coop/

The OpenWRT One [1] sponsored by the Software Conservancy [2] and manufactured by Banana Pi [3] works lovely.

[1] https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one

[2] https://sfconservancy.org/activities/openwrt-one.html

[3] https://docs.banana-pi.org/en/OpenWRT-One/BananaPi_OpenWRT-O...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Presid...

I don't see where the policy instructs the private sector to "hack back", a quoted term in the article.

Audio intercom with shared entry door buzzer are common with older apartment complexes. Newer buildings and retrofits have video.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47447823

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Can someone make an open source, privacy-focused doorbell? Perhaps like the Software Conversancy’s OpenWRT One wifi router. With an open specification, addons like a flashing light or entry buzzer could be integrated. A simple iPhone/Android intercom app usable only on my LAN would be lovely. Yes, one can get a ReoLink and muck with VLan settings but that is not consumer accessible, moreover you have to use their central service or forgo remote answering

We should look at these challenges holistically and think about better fiscal/social engineering of our marketplaces. Alvin Roth's book, "Who Gets What and Why", is a good introduction to identifying market failures and thinking about how to address them.

For those with rare diseases, insurance also doesn't help with "N of 1" efforts. A case report to consolidate critical details would be invaluable. Yet there's no administrative path to fund this personally let alone with insurance help. Without summary case report it's harder to see the big picture, get a care team on the same page, and dial in on the underlying disease mechanism.

Pharma is also not enthusiastic about "off label" use of their medications. They are happy to lower costs when insurance denies coverage for an indicated diagnosis, to demonstrate benefit so it then becomes covered. However, "off label" use is often full cash fare, making it impossible for common folk to perform low-risk physician-guided experiments when standard therapies are ineffective.

We can and should do so much better.