<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cleverpotato479</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cleverpotato479</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 03:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cleverpotato479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cleverpotato479 in "AI uses less water than the public thinks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A lot of confusion around AI water usage might stem from whether it's an open-loop or a closed-loop cooling system.<p>e.g. an open-loop system which disposes of waste heat through evaporation is naturally going to draw a lot more water than a closed-loop system which recycles the water. Open-loop is likely cheaper to build, and importantly, it _does_ use up a lot of water that could otherwise be going to a municipality.<p>So, what's the actual breakdown between these two? I absolutely _could_ imagine many datacenter operators cheaping out and using open loop cooling, particularly if building next to a source of fresh water like a river.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978391</link><dc:creator>cleverpotato479</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978391</guid></item></channel></rss>