Why do you single out Christians by saying "that's what Christians do" when you already stated "A Hindu in the equivalent situation would want his Christian spouse to share his"?

The disagreement we're having here fundamentally is that you want to portray this as an argument about how liberals "don't even understand" faith, but the content of your argument treats faith as nothing more than an excuse for the husband to dominate the wife. When a Christian husband disrespects his wife's Hindu faith, you support the husband. When a hypothetical Hindu husband disrespects his hypothetical Christian wife's faith, you support the husband. What's the determining factor? Spoiler alert: It's not faith.

So please, just be honest about the reason you really support JD, about the real thing liberals "don't even understand": that women should be subservient to their husbands.

If you think the president fixes potholes, please do the country a favor and stop voting.

No, that's the problem: you don't. If you did, you'd be appalled that JD was so callous in wanting Usha to abandon her faith. What you really mean is that you believe faith matters when it's the right sort of faith held by the right sort of person, and when that's the case you use it as justification for ignoring basic human decency.

Let me know when someone halfway trustworthy says it.

Pedantically, I think you mean Isaiah Berlin's foxes and hedgehogs[0].

> assuming we dont have some incredibly unlikely massive mobilization towards post-work post-scarcity thinking with active social safety nets

The problem being that we're not actually heading toward post-work or post-scarcity. We're heading towards post-knowledge-work. Any chance of UBI or similar will be summarily shot down by the Epstein class, most likely by using their ownership of 90+% of the media to drive a class war between the ascendant blue collar workers and the collapsing white collar workers.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hedgehog_and_the_Fox

Good thing IBM's data integration was never used for ill!

Oh, wait https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_World_War_II

Polymarket: https://polymarket.com/event/will-the-us-invade-cuba-in-2026

Sure enough, the odds are surging!

If you want to engage honestly, you can start by acknowledging that there is an enormous gap between believing that "record breaking wealth inequality is bad and causing societal problems" vs "no inequality should exist in any capacity."