<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cmceanga</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cmceanga</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cmceanga" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cmceanga in "“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more holistically"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is no guarantee that the lean proof is 1:1 with the natural language equivalent. The lean proof can be lesser. This happened in the Navier-Stokes proof, e.g. see [1] in example 3.1. Having the certificate doesn't necessarily imply correctness.<p>[1] <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08144" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08144</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:45:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50004194</link><dc:creator>cmceanga</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50004194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50004194</guid></item></channel></rss>