<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: coderenegade</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=coderenegade</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=coderenegade" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Let's make quality the norm again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's less clear cut than that, because modern materials can be better at the job they are designed for. An IKEA kitchen, for instance, might not use traditional wood or stone for its benchtops, but the materials used are actually better in terms of cleaning and handling food on them. It's just that these improvements often get bundled with cheap plastic and parts in other parts of the kitchen to keep costs down.<p>Similarly, cars today are far superior to old cars in terms of safety, and the gains that have been made on the engine side of things are nothing short of incredible. Every modern car is essentially a supercar by the standards of the 90s in terms of oomph per unit of displacement. The problem is that all of the systems have been coupled together, often needlessly, in order to improve telemetry and capture a bigger share of the used market. It's hostile towards the end user.<p>There's no question that the level of quality today is higher, especially where it matters. It's just that value extraction eventually turns hostile towards consumers in the absence of real competition and the need for endless growth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 02:31:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721480</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721480</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721480</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "An atlas of periodic solutions to the three-body problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a general solution to the three body problem due to Sundman, in the form of an infinite series. Unfortunately it converges so slowly that it's useless in practice.<p>Being unable to state the solution of a problem in closed form doesn't prevent solutions from existing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706087</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706087</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706087</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Microsoft patches Windows and Excel – breaks audio, remote access, and paste"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can honestly say that I've never had to compile wifi drivers from source in more than a decade of using Linux as my main OS, even through my distrohopping phase. And I'm not researching my hardware ahead of time, either. I don't even know what you'd need to be running in order to have to do that? Maybe void or something similar? I don't think that my experience is particularly unique.<p>The sharp edges are usually pointing the package manager at a repo (generally an official expansion) that lets you install the necessary binary.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706012</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49706012</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Benchmark: CadQuery vs. OpenSCAD for agentic CAD work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, why not. I haven't uploaded anything to github/lab yet, and you'll have to give me a few days, since I'm busy juggling work and being a new dad.<p>Full disclosure, this is one of my pie-in-sky ideas that I've been letting AI loose on with only top down direction from me. I'm usually fairly hands-on even with the model in the loop, but this is an exception, because a geometry kernel is frankly beyond my ability to write solo (and I say that as someone with a reasonably strong math background). The gamble has always been that if a current model can produce "works, but crap under the hood", future models will be able to clean it up to "works, and is solid under the hood".<p>I'll push everything up by the weekend and drop you a line.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:56:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690493</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "After Math"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem with the article's line of thought is that mathematicians can't control what others do with models that are capable of generating proofs for hard problems. Sure, maybe there's a career in taking known proofs spat out by the oracle, and translating them for mortal digestion, but I'm not sure that's what most mathematicians signed up for.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:07:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49681278</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49681278</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49681278</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Benchmark: CadQuery vs. OpenSCAD for agentic CAD work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been working on something similar as well, but not yet ready to be shared. It's a geometry kernel and then an authoring layer on top. The idea is that the constraints are tests that get run after the geometry is defined, so it's more programmatic. Sol was able to generate STEP files for credible turbo machinery with it, and I have Astra building out the assembly for an inline three engine idea I had. The drawings are looking credible, but that's about all I can really say. I'm just blown away at how far the models have come in the last 12 months.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 05:43:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49680410</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49680410</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49680410</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Real-SWE: Benchmarking AI models on private, real-world, enterprise codebases"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I switched from Claude to Codex because Claude just doesn't do what you actually tell it to half the time. It dances around the edges and does busy work without actually tackling a tough problem.<p>I'm not sure what others are doing that they're getting such different results, but I'll take Codex every day of the week.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49677992</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49677992</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49677992</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At a certain point, you don't have a choice. Before China got into the game, the only way to avoid giving Luxotica money if you wanted a pair of glasses was to essentially not buy glasses. This is the same for many industries -- consolidation behind the scenes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 05:12:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49669041</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49669041</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49669041</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "The EPA is planning to scrap public review rules for data center pollution"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They became lazy and uncompetitive, and were eventually overrun by Japanese imports. It's probably reasonable to say they never really recovered.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:58:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668298</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "How Poor People Buy Cars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My newest and most expensive car cost $5k in freedom dollars. It gets the job done. I have an older, more clapped out vehicle that cost $1500, and is in surprisingly decent knick for a 30 year old car, but it does need a paint job and some imminent TLC to keep it from deteriorating. That will cost more than it's worth, but I think it's worth doing in the long run.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668281</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668281</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668281</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "How to buy a good car for $1000"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Depends on the Mercedes. There was a time where Mercedes made cars that had a reputation for reliability similar to Toyota's today, and those cars are still fairly reasonable to keep running. The problem is that they're now becoming collectors items. Anything from the last 25 years though? Best to look elsewhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668240</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the only thing that stops this from becoming true is what Chinese and European labs decide to do. If they can keep up and keep opening their weights, then we might see some kind of democratization. But right now it looks like the gap has increased, and those groups can't replicate research that isn't published, or distill models that are internal only, or for select (very wealthy) customers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:30:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668115</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668115</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668115</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not necessarily. That's the best case scenario, but proofs can be intrinsically useful in and of themselves. It's just that for problems of that nature, speculative work is often done ahead of time, e.g. the body of work that already exists assuming the Riemann hypothesis is true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668041</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668041</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668041</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the hope, but I suspect the reality is that we see an ever widening gap between the fortunate and the unfortunate. We're looking at the automation and commodification of all knowledge, and the best models will be kept locked behind closed doors so that they can't be stolen. And, of course, "for our own protection".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667062</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the real problem. We're looking at a future where those who control AI have an insurmountable advantage in everything. They can control the amount of intelligence the masses have access to -- for their own safety, of course -- and they will never, ever be able to close the gap.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:30:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49666850</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49666850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49666850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "GPT-6 Astra"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Surely part of the problem is that intelligence seems to be implicitly conditioned on embodiment, to the point that "covering only cognitive tasks" seems inherently ill-defined or arbitrary. Everything we do is a cognitive task. At some point, the criticism will be "sure, it can solve research-grade math problems, but it can't fold my laundry".<p>Even our large language models have an implicit embodiment in the domain of text (and more recently, multimodal inputs). That seems sufficient for certain things, and insufficient for others. I suspect that AGI that does everything a human can do eventually turns out to be fairly analogous to humans in terms of sensory input and domain output, even if the scale is radically different (e.g. thousands of robots uploading (touch, sight, audio, smell, etc.) sensory data to a single model, and each being actuated individually).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:26:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49559794</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49559794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49559794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Nvidia agrees to acquire Hugging Face for $13B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well now that they own it, they can do whatever they like. They don't necessarily have to be optimizing the models for their hardware, they could just setup preferential pipelines to funnel users to their ecosystem. That seems fairly prudent given the challenges coming their way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:41:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462616</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462616</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It was a long time ago, so I might have the details wrong. I suspect it may have been expats from Korea taking a short trip to Japan to renew their visa, or even folks switching the type of visa they were on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:29:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462509</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462509</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462509</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe it was for switching visa types. It was almost 20 years ago, so I may have some of the details mixed up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:27:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462493</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49462493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coderenegade in "Nvidia agrees to acquire Hugging Face for $13B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a clever move if that's what they're doing. They're restricted in China, and are likely to face stiff competition from Chinese chipmakers in the coming years. Acquiring the largest repository of trainable models and ensuring they run better on Nvidia hardware is probably one of the few moves they have for keeping ahead of the competition. I mean, it would be terrible for the consumer, but it does make me think that NVDA is a decent investment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 05:25:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49460125</link><dc:creator>coderenegade</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49460125</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49460125</guid></item></channel></rss>