<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: codetrotter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=codetrotter</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 10:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=codetrotter" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Trip to moon required Apollo 11 crew to sign US Customs declaration to enter US"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> What, specifically, makes you think it has something to do with the time leading up to 1900 CE rather than 1900 BCE<p>Normally when someone says "1900" they are referring to 1900 AD. Unless BCE had already been mentioned, which here it had not. And if they were referring to 1900 BCE they normally would specifically say 1900 BCE. That's why.<p>And furthermore, the parent comment above the one talking about "pre-1900" was talking about modern passports. Why would anyone immediately jump from modern passports to 1900 BCE? That don't make no sense at all. Jumping to 1900 AD however, that does make sense. You see?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:35:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663731</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663731</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663731</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Trip to moon required Apollo 11 crew to sign US Customs declaration to enter US"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There was plenty of pirates around still in the 1800s AD. Aka "pre-1900" AD.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663411</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Neil Armstrong's customs form for moon rocks (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 1900 BCE<p>Nothing in the comment that we are talking about indicates that "pre-1900" is referring to 1900 BCE. It sounds squarely like it's referring to 1900 AD to me. Which is why people are saying it's ridiculous.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 19:47:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663197</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663197</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663197</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Lossless video compression using Bloom filters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I applaud you for uploading even if it’s a bit disorganised still, and I do the same. It’s better to have something than nothing. Sometimes I see people talking about something but they don’t want to upload their code yet because they have to clean it up first. And then either they don’t get around to ever cleaning it up the way they wanted, or by they time they do it will have fallen off everyone’s radar and be forgotten. At least with a messy repo it’s possible to poke around, and not the least to star it and maybe check back later to see if they cleaned it up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 22:26:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44102248</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44102248</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44102248</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Show HN: SVG Animation Software"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Blender is amazing and I love it. That doesn’t mean that replicating their success is an easy feat or for everyone.<p>If it was easy to get the required funding, wouldn’t Synfig be in a position to rake in funds and hire people to improve Synfig?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 14:22:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088053</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088053</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088053</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Using the Apple ][+ with the RetroTink-5X"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But did they actually mean literally to use ][ as square brackets. Or is it merely an approximation that is meant to be read as Roman numeral two. And then people in that time writing it as ][ because Unicode didn't even exist yet. And then people stuck with that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 14:19:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088027</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088027</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44088027</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Using the Apple ][+ with the RetroTink-5X"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One thing, off topic kinda, that I always wonder when I see mention of said computer.<p>Why people don’t use the Unicode symbol for Roman numeral two?<p>Apple Ⅱ+</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 13:50:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087835</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087835</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087835</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Show HN: Photoshop Clone Built in React"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://github.com/chowderman/chowderman.github.io">https://github.com/chowderman/chowderman.github.io</a> looks to be the original repo for <a href="https://github.com/h53d/xp-paint">https://github.com/h53d/xp-paint</a> then.<p>And the other is a clone of that repo which was reuploaded manually instead of using the “fork” UI buttons of GitHub. Which is fine and all. But better to link the original as the repo anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 13:13:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087572</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44087572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Stereogram Solver"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Came across this on a recent LGR video on YouTube: “How 1990s Magic Eye 3D Images Were Made”<p><a href="https://youtu.be/uvXY99HysrU" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/uvXY99HysrU</a><p>The GitHub repo of the linked stereogram solver is <a href="https://github.com/piellardj/stereogram-solver">https://github.com/piellardj/stereogram-solver</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 12:07:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080543</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stereogram Solver]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://piellardj.github.io/stereogram-solver/">https://piellardj.github.io/stereogram-solver/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080530">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080530</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 12:05:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://piellardj.github.io/stereogram-solver/</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080530</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080530</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Mermaid: Generation of diagrams like flowcharts or sequence diagrams from text"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>70!? That’s more than a Googol!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 00:56:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44077978</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44077978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44077978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Show HN: Chat with 19 years of HN"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this is a result of the strategy that the AI chose for picking languages. I saw when it was planning what to do it said that it was going to use a regex against the post titles. Probably it only included the specific languages above in that regex. Leaving some languages out. Which should still mean it hopefully has accurate numbers for the languages it chose to look for, but it might be missing several other more or less widely mentioned languages.<p>If I ask it specifically to count how many Show HN posts mention Lisp or Scheme in the title, it says there’s a total of 370 mentioning one or the other of those.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44031874</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44031874</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44031874</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Procolored printer drivers contained malware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That kind of confirmation does exist, it’s called using a hardware wallet, such as those made by Trezor and others.<p><a href="https://trezor.io/" rel="nofollow">https://trezor.io/</a><p>The bigger question is, when they said:<p>> G Data's research showed that the Bitcoin address linked to SnipVex had received about 9.3 BTC, roughly $100,000<p>How big was the largest amount stolen?<p>It could be a few individuals with a lot of money in their unprotected software wallets, or it could be a lot of people with relatively smaller amounts stolen from each of them.<p>If you only have a couple hundred dollars worth of bitcoin and don’t intend to buy any more of it then it doesn’t make much sense to spend as much on a hardware wallet as those cost. But if you have like $500 of bitcoin then it starts to make more sense. Especially if you plan on buying more of it. And if you have over a $1,000 and are still using a software wallet you should really look into getting a hardware wallet ASAP IMHO.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027770</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027770</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027770</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Procolored printer drivers contained malware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve seen other hardware companies that host firmware downloads for their products on Google Drive and some Chinese cloud drive. I don’t think doing that, nor Dropbox link, is different really from hosting it on Mega.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027759</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44027759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Show HN: Chat with 19 years of HN"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> frequency of discussion (especially within an obsessive subgroup) does not represent effective implementation<p>I asked the chat tool to count how many times each different programming language is mentioned in different “Show HN” post titles.<p>If the tool is accurate, it seems that the results diverge somewhat from what you are implying.<p><pre><code>    language post_count
    Python 3117
    JavaScript 2545
    Go 2178
    Rust 1251
    TypeScript 607
    Java 605
    Ruby 531
    PHP 514
    Swift 433
    Clojure 229
    Elixir 173
    Haskell 142
    Kotlin 128
    Scala 122
    Lua 110
    C++ 101
    Erlang 61
    Dart 45
    Perl 35</code></pre></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024334</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Show HN: Chat with 19 years of HN"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Would love feedback<p>When I go to the link, the URL is indicating that it will redirect me to a /hn page after I log in.<p>I write in my email and get sent a login link. I click the button to complete login. I land on a page that asks me to connect PostgreSQL or another data source.<p>It’s a super small thing of course, and I bet that when I click the HN submitted link again it will redirect me to the /hn since I am now logged in.<p>But I thought I’d point this out anyhow. Nitpicking is a tradition in these circles ;)<p>Edit: Clicked the submission again but it’s asking me to log in rather than seeing I am logged in so another nitpick on that also.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 21:04:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024300</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44024300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Ask HN: How to Foreshadow?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Absolutely. Padding it falls under making sure the text is not too short.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44016330</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44016330</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44016330</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Ask HN: How to Foreshadow?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the sentence is too short it might be possible to guess.<p>It’s not going to consist of random bytes.<p>Imagine for example that a high profile celebrity accused of murder has successfully defended himself in court and on that day he tweets:<p>I have something to reveal, but I won’t be telling you until the year 2135. Sha256 73fa194342af6b6e355e129fafd9b19d2a63589b1e3c6e2b5d94a7ca1b3e25f6<p>If this happens to be a short sentence related to recent events, don’t you think someone will figure out what he wrote pretty soon?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 15:41:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015082</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015082</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015082</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Ask HN: How to Foreshadow?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another alternative is to encrypt the document with a very strong pass key, and publish only the encrypted document now along with an announcement that the key to decrypt it will be published on such and such date.<p>If you are on a platform that doesn’t support posting attachments you can use IPFS or similar to host the encrypted file.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014465</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014465</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014465</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by codetrotter in "Ask HN: How to Foreshadow?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Make a PDF or whatever kind of document containing the things you want to reveal.<p>Make a hash sum of the file.<p>Publish the hash of the document somewhere. Like on your Mastodon timeline or on Reddit, or on HN, or as an ad in a national printed newspaper.<p>Make sure the text is pretty long though. If you write something super short someone could guess the hash for it.<p>Write a short comment along with the hash. Something like:<p>“My prediction will be revealed on Dec 31 2025. Sha256 a9774a1a6ebf564cc408cfd86b5f2c06c13d830e143989714d958d34f325db13.”<p>When time comes, publish the document.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014433</link><dc:creator>codetrotter</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014433</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014433</guid></item></channel></rss>