<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: coherentpony</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=coherentpony</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=coherentpony" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Chess puzzle I found in my dad's old book"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The task is to place four black queens and one black bishop on the chessboard so that there is no square not under their attack<p>> In other words, after arranging the five black pieces, it must be impossible to place the white king anywhere without it being in checkmate.<p>These two sentences mean very different things in the normal rules of chess.  And if you replace the word “checkmate” with the word “check” in the second sentence it still doesn’t mean the same thing as the first sentence.<p>The first sentence implies that all the pieces must be defended.<p>Edit: Eh, I guess it depends on how you view the word “attack” since all the pieces are the same colour.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129782</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129782</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129782</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Utilyze measures how efficiently your GPU is doing useful work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can saturate the entire power budget on pretty much all GPUs just by moving data in and out of HBM.  There is no compute needed at all to do this, and bandwidth bound workloads are extremely common in the scientific computing space.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996944</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996944</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996944</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "A more efficient implementation of Shor's algorithm"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is it?  Nobody else can really build on their work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 04:01:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47993217</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47993217</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47993217</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "CERN uses tiny AI models burned into silicon for real-time LHC data filtering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am somewhat cynically waiting for the AI community to rediscover the last half a century of linear algebra and optimisation techniques.<p>At some point someone will realise that backpropagation and adjoint solves are the same thing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554187</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Why can't you tune your guitar? (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It doesn’t work per-song.  Songs have multiple chords, some even with alterations.  If you tune an E so that it is perfectly a major third above C, then that E won’t be a perfect fifth above an A note.  The Am chord has the notes A, C and E, so Am has notes that all belong to C major.<p>Additionally, some songs even change keys, which makes “per-song” not enough of a constraint.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47298179</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47298179</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47298179</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Demystifying ARM SME to Optimize General Matrix Multiplications"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m trying to make sense of this question.<p>GEMMs are dense O(N^3) work operations that have roughly the same access pattern and data reuse properties across all matrices.  Of course, I’m simplifying things a lot here; tall-skinny and short-fat patterns are much harder to get performance out of but the spirit of the approach is the same as big square matrices.<p>Sparse LU solves have a different character.  There is nowhere near O(N^3) work.  You typically expect something closer to O(N^2) but getting performance out of these operations is notoriously difficult because it depends a lot on the sparsity pattern of the linear system.  Making matters worse is that you may commonly have a sparse A that factorises to dense L and/or U matrices.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 23:20:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46841938</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46841938</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46841938</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "A super fast website using Cloudflare workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah yes I forgot about that.  Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:26:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459867</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Linux is good now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Personally I have a bunch of machines dedicated to gaming in my house (<a href="https://lanparty.house" rel="nofollow">https://lanparty.house</a>)<p>Woah, that is extremely cool.  Very nice work, sir.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459855</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459855</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459855</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "A super fast website using Cloudflare workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The circumference of Earth at the equator is about 40,000 km and the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s.  The appropriate division results in about 0.13 s.<p>That seems to track.  The vast majority of requests won’t go half way around the Earth, so maybe halving that time at 0.06 seems like a reasonable target.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 17:54:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46446493</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46446493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46446493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Show HN: Cdecl-dump - represent C declarations visually"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok that helps. Thank you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 01:31:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46213011</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46213011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46213011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Show HN: Cdecl-dump - represent C declarations visually"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t understand what the visualisation screenshot in the README is trying to communicate to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 01:49:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46187406</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46187406</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46187406</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Closest Harmonic Number to an Integer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s a natural observation, but it doesn’t address the floating point problem.  I think the author should have said “fast or would accumulate floating point error” instead of “fast and would accumulate floating point error”.<p>You could compute in the reverse direction, starting from 1/n instead of starting from 1, this would produce a stable floating point sum but this method is slow.<p>Edit: Of course, for very large n, 1/n becomes unrepresentable in floating point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:30:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46070134</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46070134</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46070134</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Ask HN: How do you get over the fear of sharing code?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What a wonderful comment.  It was educational and friendly without holding my hand too much.<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45868065</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45868065</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45868065</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You originally called someone a redditor making a cringe joke for highlighting a serious historical problem.  It wasn't clear to me that it was a joke at all, but my impression is that it seemed clear to you that it was a joke.<p>What if that person has also lived in Texas for 30 years?  And what if they had a family member that died during that power grid failure in 2021?  I personally would find it quite difficult to communicate to them the nuance of a local problem and a state-wide problem when the end result is the same: no power.<p>In the future, you might consider approaching an interaction online with more balanced judgement.<p>Edit: Actually, looking back at the original comment, it's not even clear they're talking about the Texas power outage in 2021.  All they said was "Hope they have ample backup power."  Seems like a reasonable thing to hope for what might be critical infrastructure.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516516</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516516</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516516</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Texas loses power one time for a week and the redditors will never let it go. Wild how this is still a cringe joke so many years later.<p>Texas had the most number of power outages between 2019 and 2023 [1].<p>It wasn't one time.  And it's not a joke.  Infrastructure weatherization is a very real overlooked (and expensive) investment that still has not taken place.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116952/documents/HHRG-118-GO05-20240312-SD003.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116952/documents/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:02:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516321</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Primer on FedEx's Distribution Network (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not totally orthogonal, and quite interesting: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6723" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6723</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45414515</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45414515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45414515</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "AI tools are making the world look weird"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> For example, ChatGPT is even more aligned with Japan than with the US<p>I have no expertise in this field.<p>Is it actually even more aligned?  Or is it simply aligned with the elements of Japanese culture and/or media that are exported to the West?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:55:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45297169</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45297169</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45297169</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Many hard LeetCode problems are easy constraint problems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, I didn’t realise it was an advert until you told me it was.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231822</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "PCIe 8.0 announced by the PCI-Sig will double throughput again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The concept exists now.  You can "reverse offload" work to the CPU.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:54:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895952</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895952</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895952</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coherentpony in "Delaunay Mesh Generation (2012)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> While true, it also produces a topology that makes you want to throw your PC out the window.<p>Can you elaborate?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44599939</link><dc:creator>coherentpony</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44599939</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44599939</guid></item></channel></rss>