<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: coldcache</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=coldcache</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=coldcache" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by coldcache in "Show HN: One More Letter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I really enjoyed this! I do agree with the other comments that a larger vocabulary would be nice. The way some games handle this is by giving bonus points for words that are unintended by the author but are perceived as valid. Or maybe giving extra time? IMO, keep the vocab a bit limited, though (maybe top 30k words or similar).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 02:57:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929866</link><dc:creator>coldcache</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://openai.com/index/elon-musk-wanted-an-openai-for-profit/">https://openai.com/index/elon-musk-wanted-an-openai-for-profit/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42411608">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42411608</a></p>
<p>Points: 582</p>
<p># Comments: 640</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://openai.com/index/elon-musk-wanted-an-openai-for-profit/</link><dc:creator>coldcache</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42411608</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42411608</guid></item></channel></rss>