<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: combilabs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=combilabs</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=combilabs" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by combilabs in "Companies hire more after AI adoption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I expect you would find that companies that historically invest more in R&D or cap-ex tend to hire more in the following two years, regardless of the form of that investment. It doesn't look like the paper made any effort to control for different forms of R&D or cap-ex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811686</link><dc:creator>combilabs</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811686</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by combilabs in "OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually see this as an indicator that they still feel they can comfortably raise in the private market. If they tried to rush an IPO into an indifferent public market it would look worse, in my opinion. I'm not saying they're in great shape--they may be in terrible shape for all I know. But I think rushing the IPO would send a worse message than holding off.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691627</link><dc:creator>combilabs</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691627</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691627</guid></item></channel></rss>