<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: computably</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=computably</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 23:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=computably" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Leaking YouTube creators' private videos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LLM output is non-deterministic. Even if the attack fails 50% or even 99.9% of the time, at YT's scale it's a pretty huge issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788445</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788445</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788445</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Ask HN: Will programmers write more efficient code during the memory shortage?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Naively, this probably takes a lot more RAM (not to mention all the other computing resources) than to just have another HTTP handler sitting idle on some computer somewhere.<p>CF Workers uses V8 isolates rather than (OS/HW-level) VMs.<p>Also, the RAM usage isn't really a differentiator between FaaS and any other cloud instance. If a VM is used for FaaS, it's almost certainly also used across the platform for multi-tenancy, invisible live migration, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750059</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750059</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750059</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Factorio 2.1 Experimental Release"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Inserters have a max throughput of 120/s each chest-to-chest, 12 inserters can (un)load a single cargo wagon so 1440/s per-wagon. So 6:1 belts:wagons, a massive speed advantage over long distances, and much more flexible M:N distribution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:11:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743254</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743254</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743254</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Factorio 2.1 Experimental Release"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Huh? I thought a stacked belt holds 4x60=240/s<p>edit: It does seem to be 240/s: <a href="https://wiki.factorio.com/Transport_belt_capacity_(research)" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.factorio.com/Transport_belt_capacity_(research)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:39:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743067</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743067</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "The best response to AI slop and online noise is from Robin Williams"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel your comment is deeply ironic... Just shy of self-awareness. Have you considered that the conceit of the fictional character is representing that reality?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708165</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708165</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708165</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Claude Fable 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It applies its knowledge to create bespoke solutions to the problem you pose to it, and is able to self evaluate its progress towards the completion criteria.<p>It imitates applying knowledge. The imitation may be uncanny, but assigning LLMs intentionality and ToM is a category error.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:39:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473818</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473818</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473818</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Presumably they meant that they'd sacrifice <i>some</i> material value for <i>some</i> animals, not that every animal on Earth has infinitely more value than inanimate goods.<p>> infinities cannot be compared<p>That's either a mathematically illiterate assumption or a very strange philosophical hill to die on.<p>> some tragedies cannot be averted<p>Sure. The question is what to do about the ones that can be averted.<p>> some decisions are impossible to make<p>> and "prioritization" is a distraction that forces choices when choices are not strictly necessary.<p>Again, the question is what choices to make when you <i>can</i> (arguably <i>must</i>) make them. Saying they're impossible is just refusing to take responsibility. You either do something, or you don't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:13:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391967</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391967</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391967</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Gmail thinks I'm stupid, so I left"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> but this is the first time I’ve experienced software that feels like it’s actively trying to be disrespectful<p>It sounds like they use plenty of software so they must be incredibly lucky, picky, or both.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376582</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376582</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376582</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Claude Opus 4.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Except LLMs are simulacra of actual intelligence. Frequently in a single conversation working on a single narrowly scoped task, I am both surprised by a few insights and cursing at how it can miss obvious issues. The "raw intelligence" of LLMs leaves much to be desired.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319477</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319477</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319477</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If someone will sell you a service for a dollar bill or three quarters, why wouldn't you take the three quarters?<p>Because one day they'll send you an email informing you the new rate is $1.50, and if you missed the email, that's not their problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 03:56:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175414</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175414</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175414</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "A few words on DS4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Storage is multiple orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Pretty sure it'd be more like 10s/tok than anything reasonable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152928</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "A few words on DS4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Akshually, they said "harness," and not "test harness."<p>There's no particular reason "agent harness" can't have practically the same definition, substituting test-specific concepts for agent-specific ones.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152495</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152495</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152495</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "A desktop made for one"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> can't you just let people enjoy things?<p>Dumping slop into the public commons deserves criticism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 05:09:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091258</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091258</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091258</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Meta Shuts Down End-to-End Encryption for Instagram Messaging"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Best" is subjective. But "caring about their users"? Their response to RtR alone shows they care about their margins more than their users.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070107</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "What can we gain by losing infinity?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> We fit continuous theories to discrete measurements--and the good ones fit really well!--but until we can measure it how can we actually know?<p>Well, physicists came up with quantum mechanics because they found a way to distinguish a genuinely discrete phenomenon.<p>Understanding the physical universe overlaps with a subset of math. It shouldn't constrain the abstract tools which may or may not one day be useful for that understanding.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:56:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965265</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965265</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965265</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "What can we gain by losing infinity?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> An instance of a number that has a special meaning.<p>Not really. There are infinitely many infinities. Infinite numbers are not particularly more special than real numbers, complex numbers, matrices, functions/operators, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965198</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965198</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47965198</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "I have officially retired from Emacs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It's deeply distressing to watch people fall into AI psychosis.<p>It's unclear what you're saying here... Yes, AI-induced psychosis is a real problem and the frontier labs' mitigations are ineffective, to put it mildly. But using AI as a coding tool doesn't have anything to do with psychosis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937471</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937471</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937471</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "Integrated by Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I suppose they'd be comparably successful.<p>Yes, so, not particularly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:48:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931559</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931559</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "An update on recent Claude Code quality reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A strange view. The trade-off has nothing to do with a specific ideology or notable selfishness. It is an intrinsic limitation of the algorithms, which anybody could reasonably learn about.<p>Sure, the exact choice on the trade-off, changing that choice, and having a pretty product-breaking bug as a result, are much more opaque. But I was responding to somebody who was surprised there's any trade-off at all. Computers don't give you infinite resources, whether or not they're "servers," "in the cloud," or "AI."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:28:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887770</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887770</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887770</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by computably in "An update on recent Claude Code quality reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Also by the way, caching does not make LLM inference linear. It's still quadratic, but the constant in front of the quadratic term becomes a lot smaller.<p>Touché. Still, to a reasonable approximation, caching makes the dominant term linear, or equiv, linearly scales the expensive bits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:20:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887701</link><dc:creator>computably</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887701</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887701</guid></item></channel></rss>