<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: connerBown</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=connerBown</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=connerBown" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by connerBown in "The primary purpose of code review is to find code that will be hard to maintain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Totally agree. With the speed at which code can be written and deployed today due to AI, the emphasis should shift onto the review. Does the code actually run properly, are all of our assumptions correct, and are there any unintended side effects?<p>I've found the review and debugging process to be much more time consuming than writing/producing code, and just "praying it works" never ends well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763535</link><dc:creator>connerBown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by connerBown in "Launch HN: Manufact (YC S25) – MCP Cloud"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>MCP is something people think of as a "panacea" to all AI issues. I think people are beginning to realize it is just one, albeit important, part of a successful AI architecture.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:52:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763390</link><dc:creator>connerBown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763390</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763390</guid></item></channel></rss>