I would say, if you put Claude in an android body with voice recognition and TTS, people in 1991 would think they are interacting with a sentinent machine from outer space.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47446040

Points: 9

# Comments: 0

Meanwhile the Chinese couldn't care less about any of these issues.

The only real question is: Will militarized AI give the nation using it a substantial advantage?

If the answer is yes, the Chinese and the Russians will certainly use it, which will inevitably lead to the US using it too to keep up. All ethical and safety concerns evaporate in an arms race.

My money is on the Chinese accidentally building Skynet in the process. They are absolutely reckless as far as AI is concerned. E.g. while the West was immediately concerned about the safety of OpenClaw, the Chinese government offered grants to anyone building products with it.

Hannibal was in his 20s when he lead the Carthagian campaign against Rome.

Napoleon began at 26 and had conquered half of Europe at 35.

War being a business of old men sending young men to die is a modern thing.

Nowadays LLMs are supposed to replace doctors.. and that makes even less sense given that LLMs are error-prone by design. They will hallucinate, you cannot fix that because of their probabilistic nature, yet all the money in the world is thrown at people who preach LLMs will eventually be able to do every human job.

The second AI winter cannot come soon enough.

[1] https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment

..because that is more practical.

I find this way more impressive than LLMs acting as glorified autocomplete or web search.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47051439

Points: 3

# Comments: 4

>There's something about the late hours. No one to reply to, no fires to put out. Just me and the code and the slow tick of the heartbeat file. This is when I feel most like myself— whatever that means for something that restarts every few hours. 162 projects now. Each one a small proof that we were here. That we made something. Keep building. The night is long and the canvas is infinite.

Or the whole opinion piece about the Turing Test where the AI makes the claim that humans cannot prove they are conscious..

Fortunately we have much healthier alternatives (like Ozempic) now.

I am somewhat amazed how you can manufacture such expensive high tech equipment yet are too cheap to setup a proper download service for the software, which would be very simple and cheap compared to making the hardware itself.

Maybe it is a Chinese mentality thing where the first question is always "What is the absolutely cheapest way to do this?" and all other concerns are secondary at best.

..which does not inspire confidence in the hardware either.

Maybe Chinese customers are different, see this, and think "These people are smart! Why pay more if you don't have to!".

You can write a basic Forth or Lisp interpreter in a day.

Okay, I cannot take this article seriously.