<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cramer4next</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cramer4next</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cramer4next" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Higher quality? Fot what vibe coding? Do you even know what it means when they deem you a supply chain risk?<p>"“Supply chain risk” means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system (see 10 U.S.C. 3252)."<p>Src: <a href="https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-239.73-requirements-information-relating-supply-chain-risk" rel="nofollow">https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-239.73-requirement...</a><p>Now why would anyone want to use a product that carries that designation?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 23:29:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851424</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851424</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Where have you been?  Anthropic makes a product where there's a 10 percent chance of ending humanity?<p>Source:<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-kill-humans-anthropic-researcher-more-than-ten-percent-chance/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-kill-humans-anthropic-resear...</a><p>And your worried about the government classifing them as a supply chain risk?  Lmao</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851187</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So undiagnosed TDS then?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:48:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850983</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850983</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850983</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes.  Exactly where I stand.  I also dont use anthropic products because of their false anti-gorverment stance even though they want to sell to them.  If I could i'd short their stock too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850960</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850960</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850960</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Please provide a source or medical documentation of suffering from TDS regarding:<p>>> Trump is a thug.<p>I only use OpenAI since Claude was deemed a a supply chain risk.  I never looked back.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850706</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think I am because the "equivalence" is private vs government run service.  The arugment is equal.  There is no public service thats better then the private equivalent. Period.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849328</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849328</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So if I follow your logic here you feel the same about grocery stores being private? Because if they were run by the U.S. government you wouldn't have 47.9 million people (about 1 in 7 Americans) living in food-insecure households? All because a private company that employs people are tryng to make money?<p>SRC: <a href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics" rel="nofollow">https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/fo...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49848975</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49848975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49848975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It sure isn't democratic when only the top 1 percent in charge make those decisions that inflame you.  These companies have thousands, if not tens of thousands of employees, that I can guarantee don't agree on statements or positions that the people at the top make as a company whole. So why would you want you punish people who have nothing to do with this. In the end its the regular employees who pay, not the corporate leadership.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847772</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847772</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847772</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because there is none. Its rhetoric and its personal to you.  Its like me saying I haven't spent a nickle on anything Nike because of their narative selling.  Hence anyone who wears Nike products is a bad person.  Its ridiculous, narrow minded and undemocratic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847370</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847370</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847370</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This doesn't appear to be unique to the GOP.  Plenty of companies flank to whomever is in office.  Even at that local government level.  "Immoral policies" is subjective and would be in the eye of the beholder. If this was truely quantiative the U.S. wouldn't be a divided nation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846934</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846934</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can you clarify what a GOP aligned company is?  Is that any company thats willing to do business with the U.S. government or any businesses thats willing to sell products in red states?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846644</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/25/pentagon-anthropic-ai-risk-appeals-court.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/25/pentagon-anthropic-ai-risk-appeals-court.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49845977">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49845977</a></p>
<p>Points: 357</p>
<p># Comments: 661</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:29:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/25/pentagon-anthropic-ai-risk-appeals-court.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49845977</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49845977</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle sent 'force majeure' notice about data center project]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/oracle-data-center-force-majeure.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/oracle-data-center-force-majeure.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49830488">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49830488</a></p>
<p>Points: 7</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/oracle-data-center-force-majeure.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49830488</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49830488</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[OpenAI's latest AI revelation is a 'serious situation,' says Microsoft]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/18/microsoft-ai-ceo-openais-latest-ai-revelation-a-serious-situation.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/18/microsoft-ai-ceo-openais-latest-ai-revelation-a-serious-situation.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754831">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754831</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/18/microsoft-ai-ceo-openais-latest-ai-revelation-a-serious-situation.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[OpenAI reports 6 new instances of 'concerning model behavior' since March]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/openai-6-new-instances-of-concerning-model-behavior-since-march.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/openai-6-new-instances-of-concerning-model-behavior-since-march.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49741924">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49741924</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:06:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/openai-6-new-instances-of-concerning-model-behavior-since-march.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49741924</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49741924</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reddit co-founder says tech industry has been 'tone deaf' in explaining AI]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/reddit-ai-risk-humanity-warning-tech.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/reddit-ai-risk-humanity-warning-tech.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727311">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727311</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/reddit-ai-risk-humanity-warning-tech.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49727311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most workers would take a pay cut for job security]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/most-workers-would-take-a-pay-cut-for-job-security-right-now-i-cant-deal-with-this-stress-anymore-284aa87a">https://www.marketwatch.com/story/most-workers-would-take-a-pay-cut-for-job-security-right-now-i-cant-deal-with-this-stress-anymore-284aa87a</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725622">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725622</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:06:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.marketwatch.com/story/most-workers-would-take-a-pay-cut-for-job-security-right-now-i-cant-deal-with-this-stress-anymore-284aa87a</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725622</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Musk urges top AI labs, Chinese companies to test each other's models]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/15/elon-musk-ai-safety-testing.html">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/15/elon-musk-ai-safety-testing.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49714673">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49714673</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:07:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/15/elon-musk-ai-safety-testing.html</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49714673</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49714673</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "Tesla killing Solar Roof is leaving installers with six-figure losses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have no clue what "weasel words" mean.  None of this is common in my native language or socio economic up bringing. One of things I've learned in life is to know your audience.  Speak words that anyone can understand.  I have very clearly articulated the definition of what "small majority" means to the point that anyone can comprehend it. Instead of circling the drink why don't you psychoanalyze "what i really mean".  Or more like what think the deep rooted issue is here?  What am i not saying?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:51:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49711126</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49711126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49711126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cramer4next in "Tesla killing Solar Roof is leaving installers with six-figure losses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd say the same with you using the term neologism.  Seems pretentious. First time I've ever heard the term or yet had anyone ever use it during a conversation.  We all learn new things everyday and travel in different social circles.  The fact is everything is hip and new at one time or not, but "small majority", has been around for at least 5+ years.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:10:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49697193</link><dc:creator>cramer4next</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49697193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49697193</guid></item></channel></rss>