<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: creamyhorror</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=creamyhorror</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=creamyhorror" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "What is Demand Coop and why tech workers should join one"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure it's so black and white. Directing capital is powerful, and directing spending is powerful (but probably harder; this is marketing or government). I think it's more that directing spending requires influencing a lot more people than directing capital.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217374</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217374</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "UnDUNE II"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Tunes as captivating and evocative as the day I first heard them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113454</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "RSS feeds send me more traffic than Google"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm building Subweb.net (not ready yet, it's just a few test feeds without the LLM pipeline turned on yet) to LLM-tag RSS feed items with topic, relevance/interest, location, and translations, and present them as feeds. I'm thinking I could maybe let users specify their preferred custom prompts and ranking params or similar, though the standard prompt is already fine.<p>I think the open web needs to come back, but in a fair way for everyone, giving readers control over their feeds while also sending traffic and comments back to the original sources. Not quite sure how to do that yet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:09:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046361</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046361</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046361</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "SubQ: a sub-quadratic LLM with 12M-token context"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Whether this is real or not, multiple commenters here look like astroturfers - created in the past year (or hours) with very low karma</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:20:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024644</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Where the goblins came from"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Seam" has been stretched by AI from its original legacy-code context to any point in code where something can be plugged in. I actually asked an AI about this a few weeks ago because I was surprised by the consistent, frequent use of "seam".<p>Frequent words I see from GPT: "shape", "seam", "lane", "gate" (especially as verb), "clean", "honest", "land", "wire", "handoff", "surface" (noun), "(un)bounded", "semantics" (but this one is fair enough), and sometimes "unlock"<p>It feels like AI really likes to pick the shortest ways to express ideas even if they aren't the most common, which I suppose would make sense if that's actually what's happening.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:23:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961365</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Where the goblins came from"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Goblinmaxxing. Clean.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:12:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961294</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47961294</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "DeepSeek v4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, the Deepseek V4 paper itself says that DS-V4-Pro-Max is close to Opus 4.5 in their staff evaluations, not better than 4.6:<p>> In our internal evaluation, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.5 and approaches the level of Opus 4.5.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:09:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47886687</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47886687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47886687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Two key quotes:<p>• <i>Reasoning:</i> Through the expansion of reasoning tokens, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max demonstrates superior performance relative to GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3.0-Pro on standard reasoning benchmarks. Nevertheless, its performance falls marginally short of GPT-5.4 and Gemini3.1-Pro, suggesting a developmental trajectory that trails state-of-the-art frontier models by approximately 3 to 6 months. Furthermore, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max achieves comparable performance to GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3.0-Pro, establishing itself as a highly cost-effective architecture for complex reasoning tasks.<p>• <i>Agent:</i> On public benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is on par with leading open-source models, such as Kimi-K2.6 and GLM-5.1, but slightly worse than frontier closed models. In our internal evaluation, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.5 and approaches the level of Opus 4.5.<p>While they're some months behind closed SOTA (though benchmarks put them close), I wonder if Deepseek 4's longer context capabilities and kv-cache advantage will make up for this</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47885275</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47885275</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47885275</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Website streamed live directly from a model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are TYPE-MOON relationship diagrams the new pelican benchmark?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879513</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Migrating from DigitalOcean to Hetzner"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The accounts are worth something later (e.g. for spreading opinions or promoting something) and can be sold.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:19:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822418</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822418</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822418</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>oh boooy, it's a benchmarking script, but still...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:24:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796654</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796654</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796654</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "The Gombe Chimpanzee War"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reposting this for comparison in light of the Ugandan chimpanzee war. Another multi-year war between members who were originally part of the same tribe.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:12:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728574</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728574</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728574</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Gombe Chimpanzee War]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728268">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728268</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:11:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728268</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>r/codex is reporting that $20 (Plus) seems to have had its usage limit reduced (some people are saying it feels like 1/3 the previous limit now). The theory[1] is that reducing $20's limit lets them claim $200 has 20x $20's limit (and $100 has 10x).<p>If that's true, then the value comparison is not so positive for Codex any more<p>[1] <a href="https://old.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1sgxy71/so_did_they_increase_plus_usage_by_50_and_charge/" rel="nofollow">https://old.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1sgxy71/so_did_they_...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713420</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713420</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713420</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "New laws to make it easier to cancel subscriptions and get refunds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nope, unlike in the US, there's no easy way to create virtual credit cards freely in Singapore (afaik). Might be a result of Singapore law, monopoly power of the banks, or just a lack of awareness that such a thing is possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 07:51:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624202</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624202</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624202</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "New laws to make it easier to cancel subscriptions and get refunds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems to me like it ought to be possible for the consumer to cancel a payment arrangement via their card provider.<p>Yet my banking app (here in Singapore) doesn't let me block any prior authorizations. It feels like the payment networks don't want to make it too easy to cancel periodic payments? Which isn't surprising, of course, but it feels like something I'd change banks for.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 12:45:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613724</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613724</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613724</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Universal Claude.md – cut Claude output tokens"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I already do this manually each time I finish some work/investigation (I literally just say<p><i>"write a summary handoff md in ./planning for a fresh convo"</i><p>and it's generally good enough), but maybe a skill like you've done would save some typing, hmm<p>My ./planning directory is getting pretty big, though!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:59:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584081</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584081</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584081</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Universal Claude.md – cut Claude output tokens"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've started saying "gate" and "bound(ed)" and "handoff" a lot (and even "seam" and "key off" sometimes) since Codex keeps using the terms. They're useful, no doubt, but AI definitely seems to prefer using them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:52:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584043</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "What young workers are doing to AI-proof themselves"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The end of ZIRP (cheap money) is precisely what ended the new-ventures/new-projects drive among big companies and turned them all to cost-cutting and maintenance mode.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:25:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488491</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488491</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488491</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by creamyhorror in "Digg is gone again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>100%. I'm building a discussion system with this approach, so that no one forum/community can claim a topic exclusively.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 04:04:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47384236</link><dc:creator>creamyhorror</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47384236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47384236</guid></item></channel></rss>