This is handicapping the human doctors abilities. There is a lot more information a human doctor can gather even with a brief observation of the patient.

This is the real question. If they are serious about not doing something like this again, they NEED to look at what process failed and let something like this get proposed, designed, implemented and pushed to production. Usually things get reviewed at each stage. Did the people who pushed back on this get steam rolled? If no one pushed back, that's an even serious culture question and the entire org would need training.

A serious "we won't do it again", needs to be accompanied by a COE on this for identifying what went wrong, and identifying what guardrails can be put in place and then actually implementing them.

Owning a decision means you have something at stake if things go wrong. What would happen to Jack if this decision turns out to be wrong? Any consequences?

Most big tech companies get taken over by leadership with no tech background eventually and the engineering bar drops to the floor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uep5zOrsAEA

Incredible documentary about the politics around EV's made before Tesla's became mainstream.

People were demanding and protesting asking GM to let time buy their EV'1 after the lease, but they destroyed all the cars. So did Toyota for the EV RAV4's.

Would it be a gradual decline or a step change after some point?

why not though? aren't you paying for the model usage regardless of the client you use?

Also that statement of 70 meters seem very off, looking at the size of the building. What leads to suffocation is the inability to remove co2 from your body rather than lack of oxygen, and thus can be life threatening even at 4% concentration. It should impact a much much larger area.

That enclosure has a huge volume - area the size of several football fields, and at least 15 stories high. The article says it holds 2k tons of co2, which is ~1,000,000 cubic meters in volume.

CO2 is denser than air will pool closer to the ground, and will suffocate anyone in the area.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster

Edit: It holds 2k tons, not 20K tons.

I found it very interesting that they used common AI hallucinated package names.

If that was the case, the message should be about a limit on re-enabling the feature n times, not about turning it off.

Also the if they are concerned about processing costs, the default for this should be off, NOT on. The default should for any feature like this that use customers personal data should be OFF for any company that respects their customers privacy.

> You are trying to reach really far out to find a plausible

This behavior tallies up with other things MS have been trying to do recently to gather as much personal data as possible from users to feed their AI efforts.

Their spokes person also avoided answering why they are doing this.

On the other hand, you comment seem to be trying to reach really far trying to find portray this as normal behavior.

This pricing model makes no sense for a non-profit that is trying to teach coding to teenagers worldwide. They will have a lot of users (remember) who might only send one or two messages once in a while. having to pay $7.25, for some who just asked a single question, is essentially extortion for a non profit like that who's primary purpose involves reaching out to as many people a possible.

> then I think that means they have over 2,000 active members in their Slack which does not sound like a "small nonprofit" to me.

those are not employees, but most likely the people they are trying to help.

Yes please. I was very excited for Sandstorm when it first started. Sad to see it's current stage.

Also I think the world around has evolved quite a bit wrt containerization from when Sandstorm first started. I wonder how you would build it today, if you were to build from scratch. Could you utilize docker for most of the containerization?

Feels a bit unrealistic since that would be orbital speeds at least with earth gravity.