https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7203051

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7294762

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7369879

Having not practiced at all since about 2001 or so, I can still get to about 30 pretty easily. I didn't use any techniques specifically, I just kept practicing as far as I remember.

I do see where you're going, but that's already what's happening: we have so many different benchmarks because there's no real single way to test for general intelligence.

Also, it takes a human probably at least a decade of world experience, growth, learning, etc, to pass your benchmark. I'm quite confident that it will be very soon that an embodied LLM will pass your new benchmark, much sooner than a human would take if born today.

The goal is to earn on token margins for LLM calls when you build an AI-powered webapp. I proxy OpenAI and Anthropic calls so that when you deploy a site to a subdomain, your users token usage will be tracked. I charge 2x the token cost to the end user, where the webapp creator gets 80% of the profit and I get 20%. The idea is to ramp your revenue from simple AI apps directly with your popularity and real usage

I've built this over the last 3 years. The system behind it is kind of crazy: I use Abstract Syntax Trees and have the LLM write AST transformation code to implement code changes to files. I haven't benchmarked it in a while, but last time I did, it cost more in tokens but produced more targeted code changes (as compared to other agent harnesses). I wrote a blog post about this idea when I first built it: https://codeplusequalsai.com/static/blog/prompting_llms_to_m...

Your development project is run inside a docker container, and you can publish it to make it public and get users, and hopefully earn revenue. The real big goal is to make it easier to build small LLM webapps and not worry about revenue model: as users grow (and token costs grow), so does your revenue, proportionally.

Do please tell me what you think about the idea and my implementation!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49444234

Points: 2

# Comments: 2

This should be "This should be 'You're thinking'." don't you think? Why bother correcting someone's grammar with a sentence fragment? You're just trading one mistake for another. I'm hoping someone finds a grammar error in my post, because continuing this would be hilarious.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49179395

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49042528

Points: 125

# Comments: 204

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656097

Points: 4

# Comments: 0

https://idlewords.com/2007/04/the_alameda_weehawken_burrito_...

Google did the same thing with Transformers 2 I think. It still shows up as Purchased for me even though I absolutely did not purchase that. Good way to ensure I never ever watch any Transformers movie!