What was your imagined use case when you first came up with it?

Did you think Docker as it is used in the industry right now is where you imagined it would be used?

Any use cases for it that the industry missed but you think would have made things even better?

I could even see F1000 companies having their own backstop intelligence for most of the tasks and only use frontier where it is absolutely needed or as much as it is under their IT budget.

Won't it be race to the bottom when they compete on cost? Is regulatory capture the only moat left for the market leaders now?

Much easier to work with a language you are most comfortable with right?

From the github repo it seems like you really don't need a big Mac with huge amounts of RAM but SSD is sufficient.

If this is anywhere near 50 TPS, that would be a game changer in the personal LLM space!

Why on God's earth why?

Can't you just unleash your AI to "create existing or interesting business ideas" firstplace?

Now why would I pay a middle man anything if I can get the same hosted model without their own whimsical service limits?

I haven't seen many AI works that produces a pelican on a bicycle done in a "Ligne Claire" style, for example.

I guess AI's narrows down the output probability space drastically and converge on some agreed upon aesthetics. Works great for computer programs but bad for art.

It is not like ah.. there is my 85K job or 150K job and now I will never get fired or laid off.,

Late stage capitalism will find its way to make it more efficient at 85K level or at 1.5M level. Pick your red/blue pill.

If we can gain 3% across the board gains on AI based tasks without subsidized expenses, that would be a great win!?

Cannot keep count on how many times I have heard of "Babe Ruth" (1895 - 1948) mentioned in a movie/tv show entertainment context, where a grandpa or an elderly figure is fondly reminiscing things to their gen X grandkids!

Why isn't U.S. better at Field hockey, Badminton, Cricket, Ping pong etc.?

Ideally a capitalistic system is supposed to produce the best or close to the best in each category to stay competitive then what gives?

Capitalism produces the "best" in categories where there is a high demand for a product. In the U.S., the demand is for high-scoring, high-production-value entertainment. This is closely entwined with "culture".

This is why the U.S. leads in sports that are tailored for television and massive stadium revenue. Sports that are more nuanced, low-scoring, or lack a domestic TV or the US cultural zeigeist simply cannot compete for the attention span of the American consumer, and by extension, the capital that follows that attention.

They are not great at playing chess as well - computational as well as analytic.