<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: cyclecycle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cyclecycle</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=cyclecycle" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great to see this picked up.<p>Nick Morley from Grounded AI here (<a href="https://groundedai.company" rel="nofollow">https://groundedai.company</a>)<p>We ran the analysis in collaboration with Nature :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650008</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "110k+ publications from 2025 might include hallucinated citations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nick Morley from Grounded AI here (<a href="https://groundedai.company" rel="nofollow">https://groundedai.company</a>)<p>We collaborated with Nature here to study the extent of fake/frankenstein citations in scholarly literature (from top 5 publishers - Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, Sage, Taylor & Francis)<p>We're estimating hundreds of thousands of papers affected in 2025 with hallucinated citation issues<p>As part of the work we analysed 20k papers generated with ChatGPT API to figure out which citation errors are characteristic of gen AI use and use that classify the errors we saw in the wild.<p>The world's gone mad, publishing is in a nuts state, the training data is poisoned!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637364</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637364</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637364</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[110k+ publications from 2025 might include hallucinated citations]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z">https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637356">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637356</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:16:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637356</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637356</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: Large scale hallucinated citation problem in published literature]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey, Nick Morley from Grounded AI here (<a href="https://groundedai.company/" rel="nofollow">https://groundedai.company/</a>)<p>We collaborated with Nature to study the extent of fake/frankenstein citations in scholarly literature (from top 5 publishers - Springer, Elsevier, Wiley, Sage, Taylor & Francis)<p>We're estimating hundreds of thousands of papers affected in 2025 with hallucinated citation issues<p>As part of the work we analysed 20k papers generated with ChatGPT API to figure out which citation errors are characteristic of gen AI use and use that classify the errors we saw<p>The world's gone mad, publishing is in a nuts state, the training data is poisoned!</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631380">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631380</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Figuring out what to build in a world of agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>yeah this makes sense. we run a citation verification service and provide publishers with data of hey this citation could be fake etc. but we don't currently capture any "action" or "measured result" so i guess that's what we need to expand to next</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 11:13:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553514</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553514</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553514</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Figuring out what to build in a world of agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Trying to think about our best chance of making a lasting contribution (therefore actually surviving?) as a startup.<p>I'm a big fan of focusing on verification tools ("Verification is all you need"?) but who knows.<p>I'm sure I'm missing something in my perspective. Here to expand my aperture</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:11:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552916</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552916</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552916</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Figuring out what to build in a world of agents]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://nickmorley.org/#/post/what-to-build-in-a-world-of-agents">https://nickmorley.org/#/post/what-to-build-in-a-world-of-agents</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552915">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552915</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:11:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://nickmorley.org/#/post/what-to-build-in-a-world-of-agents</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552915</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552915</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Springer Nature book on machine learning is full of made-up citations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A classic case.<p>I work on Veracity <a href="https://groundedai.company/veracity/" rel="nofollow">https://groundedai.company/veracity/</a> which does citation checking for academic publishers. I see stuff like this all the time in paper submissions. Publishers are inundated</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44510477</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44510477</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44510477</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: What email client are you truly happy with in 2024?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm still using gmail in the browser, and still thinking there must be a better way. What is the best pick in 2024 for an Ubuntu user?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42316273">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42316273</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 8</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42316273</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42316273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42316273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Best approach for modernizing a legacy VB desktop app?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm tasked with modernizing a legacy Visual Basic desktop application that interfaces with temp/pressure sensors via USB. The current app handles data collection, test management, and cloud uploads. The client wants to improve UI/UX, add features and automation, and ideally make it cross-platform (it's currently windows-only). I do have access to the old source code.<p>My background is in modern web development (preference for Svelte) and Python. I'm considering these options:<p>1. Electron: Despite its critics, VSCode's success makes me confident it could work well. However, I haven't found a straightforward Svelte setup.
2. Tauri: Looks promising with Rust backend and SvelteKit frontend support in the docs. I'm new to Rust but willing to learn.
3. Python with Tkinter: Familiar territory, but I'm leaning towards HTML/JS frontends for greater control over aesthetics. Pyinstaller seems viable for distribution though.<p>Ease of development and distribution are the main considerations. Performance less so as long as it's within reason.<p>What approach would you recommend? Are there other options I should consider? I'm open to learning new stacks if they offer significant advantages.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056352">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056352</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056352</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056352</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056352</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "I want flexible queries, not RAG"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's basically what we're doing with app.studyrecon.ai.<p>What we've found is that vector similarity is often not the final solution. It is still only a crude proxy for the true goal of 'informativeness' or 'usefulness' with relation to the user goal/query. Works okay, but we're definitely seeing a need for more rigorous LLM-postprocessing to enrich the results set.<p>Which, yes, the time adds up quick!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40444766</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40444766</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40444766</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here's my attempt at a simple explanation of transformers. I would love feedback on whether I've got it right and how I could improve it. Cheers</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33932968</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33932968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33932968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "The Future of Work in an AI-Powered World"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some personal reflections on the direction of my work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907763</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Future of Work in an AI-Powered World]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://nickmorley.org/#/post/future-of-work">https://nickmorley.org/#/post/future-of-work</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907762">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907762</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://nickmorley.org/#/post/future-of-work</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33907762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Ask HN: Is there an AI service to interpret a collection of articles?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We're working on this at Grounded AI (<a href="https://www.groundedai.company/contact-us" rel="nofollow">https://www.groundedai.company/contact-us</a>). We'd love to help you if we can. Feel free to contact me (email is on my profile page)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:44:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33877552</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33877552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33877552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Show HN: We created a tool to visualize scientific knowledge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree, it's currently very superficial. It would be great to recognise and show more about the specific nature of the relationships.<p>What kind of thing would you hope to see here? A textual summary of the relationship? Or perhaps there is more that can be done with shapes and colours in this area?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683939</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683939</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683939</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Show HN: We created a tool to visualize scientific knowledge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of the creators here.<p>The keywords are grouped such that keywords that occur together often are in the same group. The colour represents this grouping.<p>There may be more useful groupings we could give or allow the user to choose between. We would be interested to hear any ideas for that</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:15:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683561</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683561</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33683561</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: What is the number one thing you wish would happen in your life time?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What do you think would be the most epic, most special, most interesting or exciting thing that you could possibly happen during your life time?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590429">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590429</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 4</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:35:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590429</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Should I be on Twitter?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As a member of an early stage startup, let's say a technical founder, should one be tuned in to social media? What is one leaving on the table one way or the other? What advice would you give for making best use of such tools, and balancing the associated challenges?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18384504">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18384504</a></p>
<p>Points: 13</p>
<p># Comments: 7</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 18:13:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18384504</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18384504</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18384504</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by cyclecycle in "Show HN: Simplified music notation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Really like the idea of trying to improve things that are so widely adopted and entrenched that most (me, at least) don't think to change.<p>We face the problem that people differ in what they think the features should be though. Ideally we would have a method to deduce what's the best symbolism for maximising input/output speed to human's minds. Some kind of scientific voodoo.<p>Beyond me what that might be.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2018 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18001768</link><dc:creator>cyclecycle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18001768</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18001768</guid></item></channel></rss>