<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dacsson</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dacsson</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 20:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dacsson" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dacsson in "Type Server Protocol"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>MAX PRO</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 13:43:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50259211</link><dc:creator>dacsson</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50259211</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50259211</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[What would constitute a "good" programming language for embedded systems?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know that ~70% of embedded systems are programmed with C, lots of movement or at least motivation is seen on moving to Rust. My question is: why this languages are good for embedded software development? And overall what would constitute a good PL for this domain?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728871">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728871</a></p>
<p>Points: 12</p>
<p># Comments: 19</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:17:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728871</link><dc:creator>dacsson</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728871</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728871</guid></item></channel></rss>