Which might indeed mean some longer running projects weren't ready yet and the next edition is better. I think generative AI is coming.

I guess what I'm looking for is purpose and meaning.

"Titanium is harder" Well, so what? I don't use my phone as a hammer.

"We made up a name for a core and added more of them" Yes? And what does that do? Will this enable new software? Or just run it slightly faster? And whilst that is a good thing, if everything is near-instant already, what does that bring?

Don't do it. Ruins batteries.

Nothing wrong with any of this. Most products in my home are no longer exciting.

We start with the pinnacle of engineering, a SPA, could be built in React, Vue, whichever.

It loads, which on slower smartphones takes a long time as they suck in running JS. When it's booted, there's nothing there. It has to reach out for data.

And so it does, to the microservice. Which might start doing something in 20ms or 200ms, it's all very intermittent due to excessive virtualization. It can't just go and return the data, no...it has to take the authentication token that was passed in and authenticate it with yet another service, which is vendor managed and even slower. Then there's rate limiting, logging, all types of overhead. Eventually, it returns 3 product rows.

Sadly though, for each of the product items we have to make an individual call to get related data, part of it coming from yet another microservice. All of these calls having their own startup time, authentication and overhead.

So for what one might call a classic "join", we're into multi-second territory. Which is fatal territory. Not to mention the shit state of data, as it's all no-sql garbage. Mind you, this is about 1/10th of what users are supposed to see on the initial dashboard.

We're talking one tiny part of a small- to midsized "app". It all costs a fortune and it produces garbage that users hate.

Old dinosaur me used to code up a CRUD app like this by the dozens. Using LAMP, .NET, whichever. Performance would be near-instant, I wouldn't allow any query response time to go over 10ms.

Every part of our stack is "best-practise" and enterprise-grade. And it just doesn't fucking work. It's 10 times more expensive and 100 times slower whilst the very idea of such an app is that it's supposed to be more interactive/responsive compared to the traditional stacks.

Luckily though, these services are multi-client. Except they're not, because then the mobile app team needs different data, and it's all just bolted on to the "generic" service. Services teams independence is a problem, not a solution. Plan a UI feature and good luck getting it orchestrated across teams each having their own roadmap.

And let's end with comedy gold where Lamda developers now need to calculate the running costs of their logic line by line. Whoops, slightly inefficient loop, that'll be 30$ extra per month on the bill. Now "scale" that problem to dozens of such developers building hundreds of services.

What a joke we've become. Distributed computing is an error, not an architecture. The point of computing is to put compute and data as closely together as possible. As the brightest minds on the planet deliver in stunning hardware advances which us software developers piss away.

But hey, the God of Complexity pays well and those footing the bill have no idea what we're doing but it does sound impressive.

The coordination is still there because a microservice team does not live in a vacuum. They build services based on demand from other teams that typically build web apps, mobile apps, sometimes server-to-server.

Hence, the "independent" team now becomes a roadblock for higher order features.

It's a digital company that is trying to increase revenue with services instead of just hardware.

How can you ignore gaming whilst offering your own streaming service? The gaming market is many multiples in size of all of Hollywood.

Excessive lectures on environmental footprint. Lots of cultural/humanitarian story telling, a pile of non-relatable tech info where they only briefly showed the embarrassing "up to 10% faster", dull/static presenters with their fake excitement.

Even the Pro model, typically the only model where they might add some actual features of any significance just to seduce you to pay more, is now nothing more than an "extra bling" model.

No fresh new demos of 3rd party developers either. All of this shows the maturity and advanced state of the platform.

Here's an idea that would actually impress all of us regarding environmentalism: user-replaceable batteries. As simple as it was 15 years ago. And no, I'm not interested in tech apologies about glue or there not being space. There's space. It's purely a matter of will.

If you brush aside male-dominated studies like tech, the new baseline is 60-40 female/male. Not even that because some are already affirming men, without the correction it could easily be 70-30 and there's a case known of 80-20.

In part this is due to old reasons (men going into trades) but also for new reasons (men preferring to benefit of a decent economy) as well as some men just staying home and playing video games.

This growing female dominance has a lot of interesting side effects, many not particularly positive. Life on campus is different as it comes to dating/romance/sex. The men tend to not commit to anything as they are in a luxury position. Whilst surely a good time for the men, this destroys any hope of genuine intimacy and scars women for the rest of their lives into thinking that all men are trash.

To men, female dominance is bad in the sense that there's a lack of male role models. They possibly had none at home, then again none in early education (90% female teachers and growing), and then very few in higher education.

Recent cultural orthodoxy (excessive safetyism, "woke-ism", mob justice) is also a somewhat feminine invention that is unappealing to (some) men. Which leads to an ever-growing political gap between men and women.

I'm from the Netherlands, where property tax is based on the municipality. A 400K home where I live amounts to 423€ in yearly property tax. Rate increases over time are capped. And there's many ways to protest against the market value the taxation is based on.

I suppose the basis for this relatively low taxation is that a huge amount of home owners here have a relatively valuable home (even the simplest of homes is expensive) whilst having a fairly moderate to low income.

If property tax would be 10x as your example suggests, I'd suspect 75% would go bankrupt.

I'm currently in a phase where the boomers in our family are moving into permanent elderly care, as well as a few that have passed on already. What is striking is their rich support system. Most have several siblings, partners of those siblings, their own children, partners of those children, grandchildren. So there's a relatively large amount of people able to contribute to the care, even if just by doing the occasional visit. If each does a little, that's still plenty for a humane type of care. A lot of this care is done by the women in the family whom in the post-boomer generation still often had the traditional role.

The social care will be dramatically different in the future. Most people have few siblings if any. Few children if any, whom may be less capable to help out as they're busy staying afloat. And most women aren't housewives anymore either.

In other words: you are mostly on your own compared to the current retirees.

Importantly, we should not use this to bash the elderly. Rather we should strive for a world where working two incomes until you're 70 is curtailed. We're over-asking people.

Meaning, there's a decent chance to make it, but I wouldn't trust it. We're talking about crossing 30-35 years, in an exponentially changing world that is exceptionally volatile.

There will be multiple financial crashes. A swift change in government. A currency change. Hyper inflation. Almost anything is on the table in that time span.

Which makes total sense because you can't run a social network using this principle.

The progressive narrative is that this type of discrimination doesn't count because these people are magically privileged and powerful. Letting this go completely unchecked is what is fueling a new rise in "traditional" types of discrimination. It's hate fueling more hate.

If you believe in the rights of individuals, it should be based on first principles. All individuals, not just the ones you happen to like.

With the CA law, EU regulation, app store policies and the like, a pretty powerful net is cast around the topic of speech. Specifically about speech that is technically legal yet considered unwelcome.

It's tempting to let judgement be clouded by a hate for Musk, but it's a topic worthy to think about more deeply beyond just X.

It's also revealing how this legislation only targets Big Tech. From a pragmatic point of view, this makes total sense. But it also shows that this legislation isn't based on first principles. It's a panicky patch on an open wound, not the definitive say on free speech.

It's strange though that the remittance scenario is so little used. The idea was that dollar remittances have high fees and that this would bypass it:

USD -> BTC -> send -> BTC -> USD.

When done quickly neither the sender nor receiver suffer much from volatility. There must be some reason why this scenario does not work or is not attractive?