<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dainank</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dainank</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:58:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dainank" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Stockfish 19"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree. I think in general, any game that is 'turn-based' (in this case chess), with a limited set of options, quickly boils down to pure theory and in my opinion 'dumb intelligence' of just remembering many things and patterns (the AI of now). As soon as a game is in 'real-time' with many-many options, it reaches a level of complexity where you cannot ONLY remember theory and outsmart your opponent. It is far more about applying logic on the fly with the limited time and overwhelming set of options you are supplied. This skillset applies to almost everything in life and serves me personally very well thus far in life. Yes, I understand that chess has different modes that severely limit time per turns which transform it more into the 'real-time' games and value, but it is still turn-based and still has a limited set of options when compared to true 'real-time' games.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643189</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643189</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643189</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Growing proof that autonomous cars save lives"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would imagine that world running on fully autonomous cars would certainly be less error-prone than a world running on human-driven cars where each human has different intelligence, reflexes, emotions, moods e.t.c. A purely algorithmic system of autonomous cars is certainly safer, just needs to be fully adopted. The only drawback I suppose is the fear of these systems being hacked, something that is not so easy with biological humans.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:25:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49640268</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49640268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49640268</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "This Month in Ladybird – August 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On a serious note, it would be nice if in the far far future, once the browser is very stable, they release a windows binary since I do sometimes still use Windows 11 for moments when it is needed and it would be a shame to then temporarily still have to switch to Edge e.t.c. instead of being able to use Ladybird there too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:04:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606064</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606064</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606064</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Highlighting My Code Based on How Much I Care"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe I missed it but has he posted his theme anywhere (I assume for VSCode since he mentioned he is using that)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:10:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49507451</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49507451</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49507451</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the worst is the lack of support for 'click-through' behavior on MacOS. This is that you have to select a window first with left-click before being able to select UI elements within that window with left-click. The amount of time lost with extra clicks is incredible.<p>It is even more frustrating that this behavior is somewhat inconsistent, with some applications allowing this and others not (although it is more often the latter).<p>I made a workaround solution here with minimal setup/overhead: <a href="https://github.com/dainank/apple-click-through" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/dainank/apple-click-through</a> but I do wish someday this could be configurable in the OS as a setting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:20:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49446078</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49446078</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49446078</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "A 3D fruit fly on macOS desktop powered by the real FlyWire connectome"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, this is my mistake, I misread the following statement:<p>> If you could simulate a human perfectly, the simulated human would not be a human, it would be a simulated human. It's not a given that it would be subject to the same rules of ethics as real humans.<p>I am glad we agree. Regarding this second statement, I also agree with you having reread it now. Even if the entity (simulated human) receiving signals is experiencing from their PoV the exact same data, from our perspective knowing this is a 'simulated human' and not a 'human' we indeed cannot assume it is subject to the same rules like you said.<p>Apologies for misreading your initial message.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:56:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49360317</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49360317</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49360317</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "A 3D fruit fly on macOS desktop powered by the real FlyWire connectome"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I disagree.<p>If the simulation of electronic impulses is exactly the same as what occurs 'in the substance', then merely the medium over which signals occur is different. In my eyes, whatever is experiencing these signals will experience them the same way.<p>See <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175140#48177554">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175140#48177554</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49357831</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49357831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49357831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Linux 7.3 improves performance when running out of vRAM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you have a link for a list of these changes. I am curious.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:30:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49343669</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49343669</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49343669</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: Interact with inactive macOS windows without selecting the window first]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>macOS requires users to 'select' a window first before being able to interact with UI elements within. This leads to more clicks, and I personally found this tedious. Furthermore, this behavior was inconsistent, with some applications actually supporting 'Click Through'.<p>I was not able to find any solutions online without drastically changing the behavior of the OS. In the end I found Hammerspoon and via AI, quickly put together a neat script that seems to work flawlessly (I have also already tested it works on the beta of Golden Gate).<p>This script enables click through on macOS, allowing you to click UI elements inside inactive windows without clicking the window first, solving the aforementioned problem.<p>Feel free to try it out and submit improvements. I submitted this on HN since I figured some users are looking for something similar since a few years.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49009557">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49009557</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/dainank/apple-click-through</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49009557</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49009557</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Have you restarted your computer this week?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed! You can even configure it to open the last set of open browser tabs as per default, saving you a `ctrl+shift+T`.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:30:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743011</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Librepods: AirPods liberated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Out of curiosity, what makes their hardware 'brilliant'? I often hear this but never actually looked into why. What is your take on that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717376</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717376</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Google Chrome update will close the door on ad blockers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is gaining more contributors and starting to be relatively compliant with most browser standards. Alpha release is expected EoY. I am optimistic for its future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560854</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560854</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560854</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Google Chrome update will close the door on ad blockers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Ladybird browser could potentially be a nice alternative in the future: <a href="https://ladybird.org/" rel="nofollow">https://ladybird.org/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556749</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Peopleless economy? Not technically impossible"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dune Messiah in a nutshell.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:59:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553856</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553856</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553856</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "A backdoor in a LinkedIn job offer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know it is only a partial solution, but I saw with some companies that LinkedIn provides a way to verify a user works at such a company. This is done via sending an email to a company domain email address (supposedly yours that you provide), and then approving it from your work laptop. I guess the administrators of the company account on LinkedIn can determine which domains are allowed for this.<p>The only way this could be abused is if the administrator accounts on LinkedIn itself get hacked and temporarily other email domains are added to the whitelist (or if an approved user themselves got hacked on LinkedIn [or their work email for that matter]). These are all the usual vulnerabilities in any system.<p>I understand that it would be too extreme to only allow users to claim they worked at a company if this verification is done, but maybe putting a warning if you get a message from a recruiter/someone that has not verified they work at their 'present' company could go a long way (instead of right now tucking away the verified logo quietly on their profile page).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:52:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48551087</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48551087</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48551087</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Musk to speak at chip tool giant ASML event ahead of SpaceX IPO]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/musk-speak-chip-tool-giant-asml-event-ahead-spacex-ipo-2026-06-11/">https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/musk-speak-chip-tool-giant-asml-event-ahead-spacex-ipo-2026-06-11/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48487991">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48487991</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:04:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/musk-speak-chip-tool-giant-asml-event-ahead-spacex-ipo-2026-06-11/</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48487991</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48487991</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that such a claim is a stretch, however, I personally love the minimalist look (it has its own charm). Saying it 'looks like the stylesheets failed to load' is your own exaggeration.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:32:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48458308</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48458308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48458308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I've seen"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had a similar experience with a Microsoft Outlook account. Supposedly this is done for legal reasons. Once an account violates certain laws, companies 'allegedly' have no choice but to permanently close that account even if you can somehow prove it was 100% the hacker who violated those rules and not you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:08:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367363</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367363</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367363</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "Mistral AI acquires Emmi AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mistral AI and the Luxembourgish government also have a strategic partnership: <a href="https://gouvernement.lu/en/gouvernement/stephanie-obertin/actualites.gouvernement2024%2Ben%2Bactualites%2Btoutes_actualites%2Bcommuniques%2B2025%2B06-juin%2B17-frieden-mistral-ai.html" rel="nofollow">https://gouvernement.lu/en/gouvernement/stephanie-obertin/ac...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 06:27:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203837</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203837</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203837</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dainank in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe nature is all there is. If we could replicate a human brain several times, and make each 'human brain' receive the exact same input data (sounds, sights, smells e.t.c.) from the moment they 'exist' until the end of their lifetime, I truly think that each of these brains will make precisely the same decisions (and each of these 'brains' would think they were conscious and in control of their lives).<p>In my eyes, consciousness is simply a natural phenomenon that can be explained but we just lack the understanding at this moment. Time and time again we have made this mistake of assuming there is something supernatural about the things we cannot comprehend and only a few centuries later it is completely understood scientifically. I think consciousness will be a similar case but will take more time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:22:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177554</link><dc:creator>dainank</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177554</guid></item></channel></rss>