Hacker News: danieltanfh95

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Don't be a meat proxy"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:35:29 +0000

> NATS control-plane events: stream leader election / R3 quorum re-form during pod churn.

this is perfectly understandable?

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "AI's top startups are barely publishing their research"

danieltanfh95 — Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:26:32 +0000

Why would they waste their time in peer review?

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "The git history command"

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:51:13 +0000

NGL AI usage is driven by friction in presentation and communication over petty details.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles"

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:41:35 +0000

> my "cover" here became the discussion itself

My "cover" is good because of X, their "cover" is bad because of Y, is not a helpful analogue nor a useful one.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles"

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:40:13 +0000

Outsourcing your ability to think to "the community" is pretty much the same as handing it over to AI. AI is trained on the community. Argumentum ad populum.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:44:29 +0000

what do you even mean to "not put a cover" on it, everyone communicates differently. Your comment here puts on a "snide, snarky, trying to be smart but failing" cover that I have discarded because your idea may have some merit to be discussed on.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 04:42:49 +0000

1. because your belief that AI-generated text is worse than human written text is flat out illogical and wrong.

2. judge content not by its cover and think.

Moonshot AI (kimi) launches a credit card

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 30 Jun 2026 02:12:01 +0000

Article URL: https://www.kimi.com/aicard

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727792

Points: 4

# Comments: 1

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "The Korean telecom giant at the center of Anthropic's Mythos controversy"

danieltanfh95 — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:56:40 +0000

That's a skill issue, not a technology issue.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Stop Killing Games fails to secure EU law despite 1.3M signatures"

danieltanfh95 — Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:23:57 +0000

> develop your game with offline playability in mind from the beginning

> players churn on their own without social features

you say one thing but the market votes the other way. Game developers are under pressure to turn a profit. If you want a game your way, develop them yourself! Thats how I started making games for myself. Projecting or pressuring others to do so yield no productive consequence.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Stop Killing Games fails to secure EU law despite 1.3M signatures"

danieltanfh95 — Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:40:11 +0000

wrong, the commission did discuss with SKG, but the entire group had their head in the sand when reasonable people asked SKG to respect technical reality and resubmit a better, reality-focused proposal as SKG 2.0. They ban anyone not in their echo chamber.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Humanity isn't ready for the coming intelligence explosion"

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:28:12 +0000

you are conflating the idea of "living with something" with the notion of "being alive". You live with your car/computer/phone. Like it or not, they change your life.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Gravity has always been quantum mechanical: it is the wrong thing to quantise"

danieltanfh95 — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:43:28 +0000

This was planned as a submission to the Gravity Research Foundation for 2027.

The Dirac Spinor equation is extremely standard, and GR would be the more famous one. The only "leap of faith" here is having the metric to be the functional of the matter wave, and not just the stress-energy tensor (which is the mainstream semi-classical approach).

Simply sharing here to prove authorship + sharing something interesting to HN.

edit: Though I note that I should have quoted Birkhoff's theorem instead, thanks for the pointer.

Gravity has always been quantum mechanical: it is the wrong thing to quantise

danieltanfh95 — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:29:17 +0000

Article URL: https://zenodo.org/records/20622089

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477840

Points: 4

# Comments: 4

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Yon – a topos-oriented language with a content-addressed lattice heap"

danieltanfh95 — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:42:35 +0000

Thanks for being honest, at least.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Replies to comments on my "LLMs are eroding my career" post"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:14:51 +0000

> The demand for software most certainly has an upper limit.

No, it does not. There is no ceiling for complexity.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Yon – a topos-oriented language with a content-addressed lattice heap"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:24:14 +0000

This is multiple logical fallacies in one comment and definitely a comment I would mark in the "pure nonsense" bin. Not all criticism is slop, but anything ad hominem (personal attacks), argumentum ad populum (appeal to popularity), or argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority) is not useful.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Yon – a topos-oriented language with a content-addressed lattice heap"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:21:44 +0000

Understanding goes both ways. OP was just sharing something they thought was interesting. The Ted Chiang piece was horribly written logically and yet it was "written well" in prose. We should look past the writing and learn (if any) the interesting parts.

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Yon – a topos-oriented language with a content-addressed lattice heap"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:20:05 +0000

Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436337

New comment by danieltanfh95 in "Yon – a topos-oriented language with a content-addressed lattice heap"

danieltanfh95 — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:19:59 +0000

Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436337