<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dart200</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dart200</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 17:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dart200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "AI is killing B2B SaaS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>for profit software is pretty gross tho. it can be made indefinitely complex, and people can make and sell tools to patchwork the complexity together, but then u need more tools to patchwork all the tools together ...<p>and u end up in aggregators aggregated aggregators type situation where optimal solutions never arise because we don't actually cooperate enough to produce them<p>ai is fitting into the notion that this is all bullshit ... even if not in the correct way</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 10:48:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46898238</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46898238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46898238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Re: Turing's Diagonals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is an intuitive proof that directly refutes Turing's intuition underlying his arguments for undecidability, by rectifying the decision paradox found in the diagonal computation for computable numbers. Once this paradox is rectified we find the resulting computation sufficient to compute a direct diagonal, but not sufficient to compute an inverse diagonal that could be used to "diagonalize" the computable numbers as Cantor did with the reals.<p>This is an application of novel intuition that I do not know how to formalize into more traditional forms of expression for computability. But Turing's rational also did not utilize those more formal expressions, which is why I'm applying the novel intuition directly against his paper and not elsewhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043171</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Re: Turing's Diagonals]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.academia.edu/143540657/re_turings_diagonals_how_to_decide_on_the_sequence_of_computable_numbers">https://www.academia.edu/143540657/re_turings_diagonals_how_to_decide_on_the_sequence_of_computable_numbers</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043170">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043170</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.academia.edu/143540657/re_turings_diagonals_how_to_decide_on_the_sequence_of_computable_numbers</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45043170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "How to decide on the sequence of computable numbers [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this is my paper AMA<p>or just rag on me like everyone else does :/</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 07:01:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44969886</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44969886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44969886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "So long, and thanks for all the bytes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The worst people in the world already know this and run our industry. There's no reason we have to accept them.<p>tbh until we change the way to go about politics, or collective decision making, this isn't going to change.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:02:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39413530</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39413530</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39413530</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "The Tragedy of CharacterAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this went nowhere -_-</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096007</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096007</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096007</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "White House unveils principles for Big Tech reform"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>u wouldn't end up protecting them</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:13:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777797</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "White House unveils principles for Big Tech reform"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>government needs to bfto on repressing speech</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:11:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777790</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777790</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32777790</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Blocking Kiwifarms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Then that's a philosophy virtually no one actually holds.<p>correct. most people don't hold a free speech philosophy. people just like taking a high moral ground they don't actually have.<p>> Very few people think death threats, fraud, etc. fall under free speech<p>us govt can't prosecute death threats unless they can prove intent beyond you just saying it, they can't also arbitrarily prosecute for lying<p>> If you do your speech at 3am with a loudspeaker in a residential neighborhood, you're probably getting dinged for "disturbing the peace", because other people have rights too, and society winds up having to resolve the conflicts.<p>if you said the same thing at a much lower volume, no one would care. the problem there is noise pollution, not the content of the speech said.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:17:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32731030</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32731030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32731030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>literally nothing is going to come of this because there weren't any serious bomb threats.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:12:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32730987</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32730987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32730987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Blocking Kiwifarms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>how do you know it wasn't just trolls trying to get KF taken down?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2022 00:04:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707944</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707944</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707944</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Blocking Kiwifarms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>yes it is. free speech as a philosophy is about allowing all speech, cause other it's just mostly free speech.<p>you're just using the words to act like you have a moral high ground you don't actually have.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707664</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Blocking Kiwifarms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>in the US, there needs to be serious proof of intent beyond just saying something to prosecute.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707635</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dart200 in "Blocking Kiwifarms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>one screenshot by someone crying wolf as much as possible proves exactly nothing.<p>the post was deleted within a few mins, so extremely sus. violent threats are posted on all major websites, idk why this one is so exceptional.<p>doesn't even look real, smells entirely like bait. or someone trying to get KF taken down.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 23:29:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707574</link><dc:creator>dart200</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707574</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32707574</guid></item></channel></rss>