<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: darthoctopus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=darthoctopus</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=darthoctopus" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Qwen3.8 27B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this page gives a 404</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:23:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295310</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295310</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295310</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Twenty Years of Pandoc"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, in my field (astronomy), Overleaf is also ubiquitous, especially for observational papers with long author lists. However, by the same token, this means that most of my collaborators are distant ones, and from experience many are happy (and occasionally prefer) to conduct business by way of emailed PDFs. My <i>close</i> collaborators have been happy to co-edit a Markdown file by way of GitHub pull requests or directly committing to a shared repository.<p>I have, for a while, been toying with the idea of maintaining a fork of (or plugin for?) Overleaf CE that runs pandoc-powered build scripts instead of using latexmk directly. Perhaps this might be something vibe-codeable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175118</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Twenty Years of Pandoc"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you for pandoc. I made the (at the time perhaps not transparently wise) choice to go all in on it when I started my PhD, and that decision has paid nothing but dividends since. I owe my career as a scientist to it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160892</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Leo's first encyclical attacks technological messianism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What is definitely being argued unironically is "it doesn't matter that humans are sentient", and I would still consider that misanthropy</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 03:23:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342736</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342736</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342736</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "The C++ Standard Library Has Been Walking Itself Back for Fifteen Years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this kind of overt inevitabilism is complicity in the death of good writing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255442</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Multiple commencement speakers booed for AI comments during graduation speeches"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law</a><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood</a><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_the_zone" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_the_zone</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177691</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Microsoft admits Windows 11's dedicated Copilot key breaks certain workflows"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can we <i>finally</i> stop having business people forcing product decisions on us? Microsoft's recent history suggests not… and I fear the facade of empowerment by LLM will only make things worse in the near future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:35:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177643</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "We Are (Still) Living in the Long Boring"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> You have not heard any of the many, many excitable AI maximalists in the media address this reality, the bits vs atoms barrier, because they have no response that can preserve their intense attachment to the idea that the world is about to change forever. So they resolutely ignore this basic reality: most of the world is not computers. Most of your life is dependent on technologies other than computers. Inconveniently, we also have few arenas of human endeavor that are seeing rapid development other than in computing.<p>I suspect stark wisdom of this nature will, unfortunately, not find HN to be fertile ground. At the same time, I am glad these other arenas, few though they be, still exist.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47897695</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47897695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47897695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>subtlety is dead on the internet of the lowest common denominator, and that enabled by AI assistance is very low indeed</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548876</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548876</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Walmart: ChatGPT checkout converted 3x worse than website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>wanting to be good at something is not exactly the same as being <i>interested</i> in getting good at something, which carries the additional, nuanced, connotation of investment (or willingness to invest) towards this goal.<p>e.g. many people want to live an active healthy lifestyle, but fewer are actually interested in doing so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495706</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Walmart: ChatGPT checkout converted 3x worse than website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> don't want to put in the human time and effort to do so<p>In most circles, that is "not that interested in getting good at it".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:02:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487729</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487729</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487729</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Who is forced to use it? Just use X11, as you said (many times) you do already.<p>I can no longer use GNOME on X11, and the decision to remove support was a deliberate one. Users are definitely <i>being</i> forced.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450977</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450977</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47450977</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Smartphone market forecast to decline this year due to memory shortage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Why is that not going to happen next time?<p>Because this shortage isn't natural, it's the result of OpenAI flexing monopsony power to deprive everyone else for its strategic gain. Unlike an organic shortage, there is no compelling reason for otherwise excess capacity to be built, since this artificial shortage can end as arbitrarily as it started.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47173008</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47173008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47173008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Smartphone market forecast to decline this year due to memory shortage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lest we forget, this memory shortage was <i>deliberately</i> engineered [1]. Thanks, OpenAI.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram-deal" rel="nofollow">https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47172938</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47172938</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47172938</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Georgian wine culture dates back, uninterrupted, approximately 8k years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what _is_ that reason, out of curiosity?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 06:11:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47147950</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47147950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47147950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Apple to soon take up to 30% cut from all Patreon creators in iOS app"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you may have fundamentally misunderstood what a technocracy is: it has nothing to do with tech companies whatsoever. From literally the article that you have linked:<p>> The technocracy movement proposed replacing partisan politicians and business people with scientists and engineers who had the technical expertise to manage the economy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 12:03:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46809071</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46809071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46809071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Web Browsers have stopped blocking pop-ups"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would absolutely love for this proposed blocker to happen, but I have zero faith in it actually happening given the user-centred nature of this feature and the user-hostile origin of Mozilla's funding situation…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46449013</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46449013</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46449013</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Sam Altman’s DRAM Deal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>every one of these things that make the deal "good" for OpenAI is a direct result of negative externalities for <i>everyone else</i>: competitors, consumers, and people who wouldn't care otherwise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 00:56:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46169439</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46169439</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46169439</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "The fall of Labubus and the mush of modern internet trends"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed, I find it very hard to take the article seriously given that every one of the notionally decentralised trends it's described has propagated on a very small handful of highly centralised platforms. For that matter, it's very difficult for me to imagine how these trends might have spread in the first place without access to large-audience virality directed by algorithmic recommendations precisely enabled by such severe centralisation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:31:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46055373</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46055373</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46055373</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by darthoctopus in "Replacement.ai"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>that <i>is</i> the point of Luddism! the original Luddite movement was not ipso facto opposed to progress, but rather to the societal harm caused by society-scale economic obsolescence. the entire history of technology is <i>also</i> powerful business interests smearing this movement as being intrinsically anti-progress, rather than directly addressing these concerns…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45634424</link><dc:creator>darthoctopus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45634424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45634424</guid></item></channel></rss>