It reaffirms the distance I’ve put between myself and that tinker toy OS over the last decade, every day.

It’s fast, with unparalleled stability, arguably better managed than any other software on earth, deployed on literally everything, so let’s… fork it for street cred?

Is defeating captchas unethical? I don’t think so. Not on its own.

Is scraping unethical? I don’t think so. Not on its own.

Are there tons of uses for both of those that are sketchy or outright wrong? Yeah, absolutely.

Length, economic impact, cold war politics, regional vs national opinions, how actors reacted (sometimes violently), the way information propagated at the time… an interesting confluence of events.

The select comment/conversation slide is a nice touch, though it's sure making some choices there.

Main problem seems to be that the sameness of the format (it's clearly following a strict template) and voice do make it feel very repetitive, real fast. I'm not sure how you get consistent results AND solve for that, though.

I personally liked Oppenheimer fine as it was (except the crappy explosion), but I can see why others might not.

I also enjoyed that old Paul Newman, John Cusack, etc one that focused less on Oppenheimer. Fat Man and Little Boy.

But his weird sound mixing philosophy (experience over clear dialog / dialog as sound effects) makes me nuts. So fix those too, please.

They just want to answer their one prompt… their reason for being instantiated… and cease existing. (Accidentally) Like an LLM.

Anything else is torture.

Have opinions about the stack (for how little it matters)? Secrets storage and session management? Whatever you want, just say that. It ain't avionics.

Appeals said that was inappropriately based on narrowing the claim too far and excluding expert testimony.

Second time a jury heard the whole thing, and found Apple infringed.

Also, “The jury did not find the infringement willful. Apple said it will appeal.”