<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ddwrll</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ddwrll</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ddwrll" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ddwrll in "Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What happened to the nano/mini/standard/pro naming scheme, which worked perfectly fine and is intuitive to understand? Why does OpenAI insist on having the most inconsistent and confusing model and product names possible?<p>I'm looking at you Codex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689408</link><dc:creator>ddwrll</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689408</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689408</guid></item></channel></rss>