I feel like when it comes to "Alien Spaces" or new approaches, there's no other way than to babble a lot of stuff that doesn't move the needle much but then leads through the implicit to language and communication mechanisms to a spike out of the local minimum. Didn't the ancient guard have hundreds more notes than ended up in their useful collections?

Nowadays you have so much research that nobody really cares to just ramble with attempts and approaches ... and instead skims the work that others certainly tried already ... distancing themselves from the possibility of new approaches ...

Small advisory roles for young companies, NGOs and free workshops for young and non-professionals. "What the hell are governance, risk, compliance, in the first place and does anybody care?" ...

Aren't governance, risk, compliance the most ignored in reality and more of a "stage acting" thing until shit goes haywire?

I just quickly checked the 25,000 new research proposals and found a few that indeed touched my hypothesis and the underlying theories but no direct connection.

Honestly, as so often found in criticism of academia, your approach seems very technical and alienated--pun intended--from the people, their lives and interactions with each other and the world, including tech, and it thus seems that your objective is "estranged" from the very thing you are trying to find.

If Claude's and other LLMs surprise when they find rare occurrences of ideation and inferential trains of thought is worth anything, then that it's an appreciation of training sets lack of humanity and their individual thinking.

Here's some idea I likely will never get to: "linguistic conceptualization of psycho-social reverse pareidolia" or "when, why and how humans were taught to not identify meaningful connections". The "doesn't look like anything to me" equivalent so imperative to the narrative of the TV Show Westworld, created by Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy.

As much of a merry-go-round, cough, it is, science philosophy and personal narratives and perspectives is where scientific novelty resides, so getting LLMs to extract more out of the cattle, sorry, people, might not be such a bad idea, after all.

The smarter ones, of course, can be split into those who write articles about AI models' controversial takes on humans and those who wouldn't [stoop so low, babble such BS even if they were drunk, never deceive others for the sake of their portfolio, ... feel dumb writing nonsense like that without labeling it fantasy or science fiction or hallucination, ...]

Side Note: it's tempting to go " 1923! some interest groups managed to normalize the opinions of dozens of millions of people. The Nationalist Extremists and soon to be mass murderers had fans and supporters all over the globe. Somehow these interest groups tapped into whole pools of common linguistic and emotional registers that were biased by and towards frauds and cheaters who were desperate that some other groups of people were getting ahead without being fraudulent cheaters and deceivers ... "

> but I thought a demo would make the landing page quite heavy

Just pack a slick, slim demo into it's own section right under the themes, which I'd put above the "Write freely in the editor." section.

And have a ToC of your landing page visibly present ... I scrolled once and was annoyed by the speed of the vid and how useless the "Write freely ..." section felt in the context built by the landing page thus far ...

> I was trying to keep it under a minute

...

Keep the vid slightly under 90 seconds and don't lead with that flow diagram... A good Anime intro or movie trailer you see once and sign up for the run.

I almost tried it but because it said __sign up__ I didn't.

I had a bit of a weird time getting what Bloffy's thing was ...