(I use Android Auto, but it's basically the same thing for these purposes)

And if nothing else, leaving a company whose service sucks doesn't need to send a message, it's just moving so the service you receive improves.

As I understand it, Windows doesn't expose the necessary low-level hardware information for something like this to be possible.

And in many contexts yes, but I still see plenty of articles listing best/cheapest foldable phones that conflate the two. I can't even fully fault them either, because the "flip" ones do "fold".

I'm also looking forward to nomenclature settling so the horizontal-folding passport-style folding phones (like this, which I find interesting) can be more clearly distinguished from the vertical-folding flip-phone style folding phones (which don't remotely interest me).

And I actually wouldn't mind seeing more discussion about atproto. I'm mildly curious about whether anyone is doing anything with it.

Phrases can have meanings beyond just a naive combination of the words in them. And indeed "algorithmic feed" in the bill means what what we all understand that term to mean when we aren't paralyzed by pedantry.

> Under the law, [...] these users will only be shown content they request or search for or that is posted by a creator or friend they follow.

You may disagree with the motivation behind the bill, but you do the discussion a disservice to assume the people writing it are incompetent enough to not define their terms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States...

I also see examples of "he only got 1/3 of the vote", but that's not what I was trying to do. I was pointing out non-voters as effectively voting "either is fine", in which case effectively they both got 2/3 of the vote.

The later does not preclude the former. They exist, and they don't vote. I'm not sure what nitpick you're trying to make.

And "cognitively [un]developed" is a weird way to say it; I wouldn't call that a "bland" term at all.