<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: denisdev1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=denisdev1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=denisdev1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by denisdev1 in "Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I liked it, will try. Good job</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 17:47:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182908</link><dc:creator>denisdev1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182908</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182908</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by denisdev1 in "Code Review for Claude Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My experience has been similar. LLM reviews are useful, but they tend to always produce findings. Even on small or very clean changes you wll still get a list of suggestions.<p>So part of the workflow becomes filtering signal vs noise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:50:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319842</link><dc:creator>denisdev1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319842</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47319842</guid></item></channel></rss>