I’ve seen “LILCHYT” and “MYSHART” on the road recently.

Please stop attempting to flame/throw petty shade because you don't like that I disagreed with you.

The entire problem of search is that the user has the wrong data and wants to use it to receive the correct data. That was the start, not the state we’ve ended up at - it is unironically how we got to LLMs.

“Oh you want consent involved in this interaction? Then we’ll annoy you about it constantly instead of respecting the intent of the regulation.”

I also believe that due to the sycophantic nature of popular LLMs, people tend to fool themselves more than usual by having a digital "yes man".

I understand what you’re trying to say, but this sentence could be an argument against DNA. It’s also chemical compounds that contain an entire script of what our species can and cannot do - and much more.

If you like running your business and want to keep what you built, don’t.

This sounds like your personal feelings, not quantification.

What exactly would you think of anyone else applying that reasoning to anything in society? Would you think that they belong in society?

This came about after 3 separate incidents where I went to use the harness and found it now provided a degraded experience because Microsoft unanimously decided to change some part of it without my consent.

I am a staunch believer that the most important thing a tool can do, other than its job, is provide a static experience until the user opts to change it. I use AI like a tool, because it is. I need it to behave the way I expect, or it's not actually useful to me.