<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: devoria</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=devoria</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=devoria" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by devoria in "Agents can now create Cloudflare accounts, buy domains, and deploy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The unsolved layer here is failure detection. An agent can call Cloudflare's API and get a 200, but if it actually tried to fetch some user-facing page
mid-workflow it'll just see the SPA shell. The agent has no idea anything failed.<p>Curious if Cloudflare's flow has any built-in "did this actually work" verification, or if it's all "tool returned, move on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050694</link><dc:creator>devoria</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050694</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050694</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by devoria in "Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer than I'd like"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The thing I've been thinking about: agentic engineering still gives you per-step verification.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:34:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050678</link><dc:creator>devoria</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050678</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050678</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by devoria in "Claude Code with Bedrock broken again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bedrock parity with Anthropic-direct usually drifts first on the newer features</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:22:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041248</link><dc:creator>devoria</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041248</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041248</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by devoria in "My Claude Code Setup: Pure CLI, Pure Unix, Zero IDE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>everything brilliant is simple. but with IDE you can add dashboards when everything is at hand. in the terminal it's a bit clunky. and also the terminals don't support glassmorphism. why did apple try in vain?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041222</link><dc:creator>devoria</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041222</guid></item></channel></rss>