<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dghlsakjg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dghlsakjg</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dghlsakjg" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Your ePub Is Fine. Kobo Disagrees. Blame Adobe"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was an average-joe high school student back then.<p>People hated flash. Even non techies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:03:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48535711</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48535711</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48535711</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "The redistribution of housing wealth caused by rent control (2023) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>BC, Canada has a similar "just cause" (they have a list of valid reasons to evict). Although they do allow unlimited rent raises between tenants.<p>The key is that there is a very low cost resolution tribunal, and the penalties for evicting improperly are incredibly harsh (12 months rent to be paid to the tenant in cash).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48530197</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48530197</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48530197</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This was a municipality working with a government associated IT company.<p>What does it have to do with Brazilian academia?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529755</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s the joke.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529713</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529713</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529713</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "A Call to Action: Stop the FCC's KYC Regime"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don’t see the harm in requiring telcos - famous for handing over data without warrants or court orders - being forced to have identifying data for every subscriber?<p>I can think of a half dozen ways that can get abused. Remember that in the states policing is decentralized. There is always some department somewhere willing to abuse their power. Look at how flock has been used to stalk partners, or how geofencing was used to sweep up everyone in the area of a protest, or how stingray is used to listen to all calls in an area. This is opening up avenues of abuse for almost no benefit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505407</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505407</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505407</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Didn’t uber catch a lot of shit for nerfing the app for people suspected to be enforcing the laws they were breaking?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485820</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Many Americans have a strong bias for measuring everything in money. If you've lived there, it can be shocking how pervasive the thinking is in EVERY decision.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484198</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484198</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484198</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Building an HTML-first site doubled our users overnight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Next time I have trouble checking in on an airline site I’ll remember that there are so many other sites to interact with that whatever I was trying to do probably doesn’t matter.<p>I wouldn’t sweat the broken fridge either though, there’s so many other electrical appliances in the house to use.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477955</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477955</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477955</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are plenty of places with non partisan districting. You don’t hear about it because it tends not to be so outrageous as to be newsworthy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477867</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "RIP software hackathons. Long live the hardware hackathon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To a large degree, this is how the real world works too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:59:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48476411</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48476411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48476411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Age verification tech could put children at greater risk, says think tank"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It sounds like you have a plan!<p>Best of luck.<p>Sucks that we’re stuck as parents running an experiment on children where the only beneficiaries are corporations, and there is no correct answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:02:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455769</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455769</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455769</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "AI is slowing down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>His numbers are based on sources that he says he doesn’t trust, which is quite interesting. While he may be directionally accurate (eg. The revenue needed to match the spend seems lofty at best) he seems to be mixing and matching numbers to create a worst case scenario that doesn’t necessarily line up with reality. Combined with his complete unwillingness to be open minded about anything even tangentially related to AI, and I can’t take him that seriously.<p>Publications love a doom and gloom rant, which is why he seems to have built an entire career on hysterical anti-ai screeds. It doesn’t mean that he’s right though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454740</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Age verification tech could put children at greater risk, says think tank"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or they’ll be mildly resourceful and pickup a cheap Walmart phone, or a friend’s old phone and learn that they can’t be open with you.<p>I ran a summer camp for teenagers. They know how to get around that stuff if they want. They know how to hide it from their parents to keep access.<p>You’ll do far better to explain how these things are harmful, and help them make decisions that are healthy.<p>Below a certain age I’m sure it works for a time, but you will eventually have to find a balance.<p>That’s why parents want bans. Their kids are going to go where the other kids are. If they are all banned on instagram, they won’t care about finding a way onto a platform where none of their friends are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446206</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446206</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446206</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the context of my message it is very clear that they is SpaceX. This isn’t a secret. Nasdaq has said that they are changing the rules specifically for this listing.<p>It’s clear you aren’t interested in a good faith conversation. Thanks for the discourse either way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427761</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427761</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427761</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google to pay SpaceX $920M a month for compute capacity at xAI data centers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is one of the columns. The headline makes my point succinctly. Your paraphrase of the column misses the crucial point. A Nasdaq index fund doesn’t buy a company unless it is in the Nasdaq. Under the old rules SPCEX was ineligible for listing. Now Nasdaq index funds all have to buy. Index funds by nature do not selectively buy stocks, if the stock is in the index, they buy, that’s their mandate. That’s the game, to be included in as many indexes as possible that force institutional investors to buy. That’s hundreds of billions worth of funds that now have to buy in, that previously wouldn’t have had to if it wasn’t listed on the Nasdaq.<p>The SP500 did not waive the rules, and that made above the fold news this week, because it is a major blow to the big IPOs happening this month since they are valued so high. It will be harder for them to move stock if the massive index funds aren’t buying automatically. The big IPOs this month are asking for prices that demand hundreds of billions or trillions of dollars of liquidity. Index funds are automatic liquidity, but only if you are on the index.<p>They didn’t ask them to change long standing rules for shits and giggles.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427636</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427636</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427636</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google to pay SpaceX $920M a month for compute capacity at xAI data centers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It has been covered extensively. The change of nasdaq rules has been covered by Bloomberg, WSJ, NYT, and most others who have reporters on the Wall Street beat. Columnists at all three of those publications have called it out as a possible play on institutional indexing money. I don’t need to tell you who like it’s some big secret either. It was Elon Musk on behalf of spacex. The changes were openly part of the ipo.<p>I’m not going to cite sources for a major financial news story that is being extensively covered in the financial and general press.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427517</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google to pay SpaceX $920M a month for compute capacity at xAI data centers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Passive investors and retirement accounts are heavily in on automatic indexing.<p>This deal has been pushed hard to be included prematurely in the indexes to the point that Nasdaq changed the rules.<p>The accusation is that these changes were made so that index funds will buy this stock automatically far earlier than they would have previously. Given the… uh… astronomical asking price, it looks like SPCEX is meant for Elon stans and institutional index investors to be the bag holders.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427346</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48427346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google employees internally share memes about how its AI sucks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A table saw is technology so dumb it can be made to chop off your fingers.<p>An air conditioner is technology so dumb that it can be used to  kill an infant with hypothermia.<p>A human is a sentient being so dumb that it can be made to believe in things far more outlandish than a “Google mushroom”.<p>I can keep going. The point is that just about anything useful can do something dangerous or stupid. Most people can see that. Most people are more interested in how useful something can be, not how useless it is when intentionally misused.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:34:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404940</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404940</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Google employees internally share memes about how its AI sucks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anyone can drive an F-22 into a ditch. Doesn't mean that it can't also be used to drop a 2k lb. bomb down your chimney from 40,000 ft.<p>That demonstration is interesting, but not really something new. Fooling very intelligent people into believing something completely absurd is incredibly easy. How many scientific papers have been retracted based on wholesale fabrications that fooled an entire review committee?<p>The question isn't "What is the dumbest thing I can do with this technology?" its "What is the most valuable thing I can do with this technology?"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401640</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dghlsakjg in "Uber's $1,500/month AI limit is a useful signal for AI tool pricing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if you will see app makers begin to open APIs (MCPs) up in ways that replace computer use. Computer use via human interfaces is pretty hacky IME, and if you can use an app that exposes spreadsheets in a way that reduces token costs by 90%.<p>I'm optimistic that the demand for AI accessibility will drive programmatic interfaces in places where companies were previously reluctant to.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:43:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392224</link><dc:creator>dghlsakjg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392224</guid></item></channel></rss>