Lots of things can be done while aimlessly walking.

Yeah and the vast majority of the internet and all these mega corps run on open source while paying pittance back to the ecosystem. Cry me a fuckin river.

Can't wait til someone sue's them for "scraping" their site for web previews and thumbnails everytime someone shares a link on Facebook.

The double standard of these muppets.

For vapourware. SSL certs should never have ever cost anything. They've always been a scam.

Total shit show.

Increasing the distance between inputs and outputs increases complexity.

Reusable code isn't all that reausable when nobody understands it or things are so fragmented people can't figure out how to operate the code base.

This isn't a rule. It's a moderation thing.

Abstractions have non zero complexity costs.

And

Repeated code has non zero complexity costs

Why is this a hard concept?

It doesn't make dry any less valid.

Generally you can invoke both reasons to do something but the underlying reasoning is always complexity.

It's a custom nudge. It's shown by the Spotify app. Clicking on the CTA takes you to the settings page or something.

Speaking of which, anyone from Spotify around?

Could you kindly take your request for control over Bluetooth and shove it up your fuckin arse?

Why must I say no to this every time I open the app?

No means no.

Overturning Roe v Wade doesn't change anything related to these types of abortions. It only allows states to make up their own laws. Most of which won't change from what it is now and most of which only ban elective abortion.

Oh please. Cool it with the strawman arguments. It's boring.

They aren't owned by the state. They simply can't kill the human growing inside them. That's it, that's all it is.

We don't need to drop to analogies and hyperbole, we have the language to describe what is happening. A woman, in most instances, chooses to have a baby grow inside of them. But regardless of how it got there, at a certain point that baby deserves human rights.

That point is all that's up for debate. At what point does a baby become a human with rights to life.

One side argues birth, one side argues conception. The vast majority decided viability 22 weeks (disturbing imo but neither here nor there).

My human right to free speech stops at the point it harms someone else.

I don't see why these rights would be any bloody different.

If you want to debate this issue you need to be willing to define when a baby becomes a human, because THAT is the only thing being debated here.

Any kind of support role will signal future employers that your not a good programmer.

I got my first job on around interview 10 after sending my cv and tailored to each job cover letter to over 100 job ads and places I wanted to work. (Just because ethey don't have an ad up doesn't mean they're not hiring people interested in the company)

At the same time I think it was a bit of a suspect situation. It's pretty rare to end up with a full term baby dead in the toilet.

That's not in the article.

> but I see no evidence mentioned that she followed through on the purchase

This article is about abortion rights. I think it's fair game to call a 35 week abortion what it is.

> women are reduced to birthing vessels

There isn't some conspiracy to turn women into birthing vessels. The only thing under debate is at what age a baby becomes a legal person afforded rights to life and at what age a women loses her right to end that life.