From fingerprint/face id to digital id..

Like banking apps are now using play protect/depending on Google.

(Just a matter of time Google/Apple will be a banks themselves, as is the danger with governments)

Ofcourse the world could be a more open place, but constraint, rules and control are too pleasing to not implement, sadly.

Their core network has IPv6, but not their customers, 17% market share in telecom in the Netherlands.

Are there more?

There is a difference between writing for mainstream software and someone's idea/hope for the future.

Software that is valued high enough will be owned and maintained.

Like most things in our world, I think ownership/stewardship is like money and world hunger, a social issue/question.

The difference is when is this done; In a upfront discussion, while developing, or after user feedback.

For LLM we know it needs to be written down. (At least if we want human tracability)

And agile ofcourse is a shortend waterfall to get user feedback early on.

Giving enough context is important for every case.(humans and llm's alike)

And then having uuidv7 as primary and foreign keys, can give you a performance gain.

https://help.vimeo.com/hc/en-us/articles/30298226209169-Chan...

And are LLM's unable to reason?

Is Microsoft a player, like that? I don't think so that much, they only have an active control on there own energy/oil usage.

The only thing that will happen if Microsoft is giving in to these demands of employees, it will be perceived as morally good, and then in reality the oil companies still have a need and switch supplier. All because energy demand didn't change, only morals.

It is like the Maslows hierarchy of needs, but then applied at a world scale, we need to take into account everybody's (humans, animals, nature, companies and other societal structures) needs, and address the problems from the ground up. Otherwise the world will end up in a fighting mess, like what you describe in the UK, fighting solar and wind energy, or those employees of Microsoft, all never actualizing the energy transition.

The best course of action to reduce fossil fuel usage is to see which processes on earth use that fossil fuel, and see if that can be transformed to use renewable energy. A combination of scientific research, regulation, awareness, education and trying to change human behaviour is probably the best way forward.

Blaming specific companies, for helping solving an energy need, seems not helpfull in that way.

I think Spotify did set and still sets an example how content can be distributed and made available for a pretty acceptable price, I still have to see somthing like it for video.

And algorithms can be a nice feature, but fastly can become generic or a bubble, being able to actively choose what you want to listen to, that does if for me.

You could maybe have matched with a change in the transaction isolation level for innodb