<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dogcow</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dogcow</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dogcow" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Running Your Own AS: BGP on FreeBSD with FRR, GRE Tunnels, and Policy Routing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, same here. Very frustrating. It is almost as if the powers that be don't want lowly netizens controlling their own destiny.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 17:48:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936684</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936684</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Self hosting my media library with Jellyfin and Wireguard on Hetzner"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For those who feel that self-hosting limits music discovery, a more traditional option is "radio" (traditional in the sense that you listen to a curated playlist made by someone else).<p>Radio Paradise [1] and Radio Swiss Pop/Jazz/Classic [2] are two great ad-free ways to discover new music. There are probably tons of others out there.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.radioparadise.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.radioparadise.com/</a>
[2] <a href="https://www.radioswisspop.ch/en" rel="nofollow">https://www.radioswisspop.ch/en</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46520375</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46520375</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46520375</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "ChatControl update: blocking minority held but Denmark is moving forward anyway"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or, more likely, we're seeing the result of a generation growing up glued to cell phone screens and crappy social media every waking moment from their youngest years?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 02:54:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45245635</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45245635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45245635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Nest 1st gen and 2nd gen thermostats no longer supported from Oct 25"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Luckily, this can all be achieved using a Wi-Fi or (even better) a Z-Wave thermostat that is 100% locally-controlled using something like Home Assistant or any number of other solutions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 22:39:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45144518</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45144518</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45144518</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Steve Wozniak: Life to me was never about accomplishment, but about happiness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is spot on. Nicely written! I think many people forget what a great, unique, and exciting time those decades were. (Or many simply did not experience them).<p>There was a palpable sense of nearly unlimited potential for a brighter future, powered by technology.<p>As someone who experienced those decades, present day feels like a dystopia in comparison.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 03:18:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908267</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908267</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Encryption made for police and military radios may be easily cracked"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really true on modern digital radio systems. They are AES-256, but the voice frames are encrypted right after the vocoder does its thing, then the voice data is dropped into the stream just as if it were clear voice. It's all wrapped in the same same digital protocol (like P25 or numerous others), so the signal is very distinct in that encrypted and clear communications both sound the same to someone listening to the raw audio.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 01:33:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852057</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Encryption made for police and military radios may be easily cracked"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pre-shared, static keys are unfortunately quite common. However, the P25 standard does provide for re-keying over they air through a process known as OTAR (Over The Air Re-keying).<p>To put it very simply, radios communicate with a central Key Management Facility (KMF) using a special key (UKEK, Unique Key Encryption Key) to securely transport the new key material. There's more to it than that, of course, but these features are heavily used by the feds and also by larger state and local systems -- because manually re-keying each radio is a huge pain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852029</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44852029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "I tried living on IPv6 for a day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, I know about the workarounds, but that just kind of defeats the purpose for me. Also, I've read comments from folks stating they were having a hard time getting a larger prefix from Comcast using PD... don't know how universally true that is.<p>Using DNS to resolve everything solves part of the problem, but firewall rules are another issue. The router would need to have the capability to update everything dynamically when the prefix changes. I think this in the works for pfSense, but I'm not sure if its actually supported yet. It looks like you might have to mess around with some 3rd-party script to make it work.<p>I guess I'm just generally disappointed that the whole process seems unnecessarily messy. I don't have a v6-compatible ISP right now anyway. I was thinking about trying a tunnel, but I'm not seeing the benefit in it right now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 02:35:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773614</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "I tried living on IPv6 for a day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks, I appreciate your explanation. I was aware that there are workarounds, but to me that defeats one of the core tenants of IPv6, which is that we're supposed to be doing away with this NAT and NAT-like nonsense by giving everything a globally rotatable IP.<p>When I was reading up on everything, I also learned that your router can request a bigger prefix, but I ran across several posts from various folks stating they could only get a /64 from Comcast no matter what they tried, so I'm not sure how universally supported DHCPv6-PD requests are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 02:29:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773590</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773590</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773590</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "ThinkPad designer David Hill on unreleased models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Please offer a good TrackPoint keyboard. Please.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773447</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773447</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773447</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "I tried living on IPv6 for a day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I recently decided that it was high time to stop ignoring IPv6 after 30 years of computing and actually learn how it is supposed to work.<p>So I started digging in, and there's definitely a lot to like.<p>But I see two big problems that are showstoppers in my opinion, at least for my home network (not even considering the fact that very few residential ISPs even support v6 at this point):<p>1. Generally speaking, the IPs of your LAN are based on the prefix assigned by the ISP. Most residential ISPs don't offer static prefixes. This means that every time your prefix changes, the IPs of all your devices on your LAN change. Seems like this "feature" was developed in a more idealistic era when people probably thought everyone would be getting static IPv6 addresses, since shortages would never be an issue. Unfortuantely, they failed to foresee the fact that most major ISPs are terrible, greedy organizations that either outright refuse to offer static assignments, or continue treating them as if they were scarce IPv4 resources, charging a premium or requiring business-class service to even get them.<p>2. The ISPs that do support v6, like Comcast/Xfinity in the USA, are only allocating one /64 prefix. This means you can only have one subnet (VLAN) on your LAN! Why are they being so stingy?<p>I would love to migrate to IPv6, but these two issues alone make it feel like a clown show for home users.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 01:45:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773416</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "I tried living on IPv6 for a day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is such a dumb problem with IPv6. Unless ISP stop being crappy and start offering static prefixes to regular residential subscribers, then I just don't see how v6 would ever be practical. This seems like a big oversight in the design and implementation of v6.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773340</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773340</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773340</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "I tried living on IPv6 for a day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doesn't using ULAs kind of defeat the purpose (or one of the main intents) of IPv6, which is every device having a globally rotatable IP address? It kind of puts us right back in the IPv4 with NAT situation, only with longer, uglier addresses.<p>I personally think it is absurd that the ISPs that do actually support IPv6 are being so difficult and stingy about assigning static v6 prefixes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 01:20:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773320</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773320</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44773320</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Online Collection of Keygen Music"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is amazing. Thank you so much to the authors for putting the time into this and sharing it. I would love a way to download a local archive of music like this.<p>Also, I hope this site doesn't disappear if/when the rather unpredictable .tk TLD operator decides to do something dumb.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 00:24:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44772968</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44772968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44772968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "A CarFax for Used PCs: Hewlett Packard wants to give old laptops new life"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is nothing more than another data harvesting scheme thinly veiled as a useful service.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44615236</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44615236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44615236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Radio Garden"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anyone looking for a commercial-free, listener-supported "radio" station would be remiss not to check out <a href="https://radioparadise.com" rel="nofollow">https://radioparadise.com</a> -- it is truly a rare-gem in our over-commercialized world.<p>And we can't talk about music streaming on the Internet without mentioning one of the originals -- <a href="https://somafm.com" rel="nofollow">https://somafm.com</a> -- still going strong.<p>I support both of these stations because their "business model" is so refreshing, very much in the spirit of the "Old Internet," which I miss dearly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:20:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44362821</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44362821</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44362821</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "SheepShaver is an open source PowerPC Apple Macintosh emulator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Somewhat related:<p>Previous, an emulator of NeXT boxes.<p><a href="https://previous.unixdude.net/" rel="nofollow">https://previous.unixdude.net/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 02:15:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43407660</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43407660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43407660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "New Mac Mini with M4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Came here to echo this. Also, it always amazes me how many people respond to warnings like this (as seen in this thread as well) saying lower-resolution displays look just fine. I returned a M2 Mac Mini solely because it looked so awful on all of my monitors -- I tried 2 different 32" 2k displays, plus a handful of 24" displays. Everything was fuzzy and awful looking. Not something that could be tolerated or ignored... Completely unusable. I feel like this fact is not well known enough.<p>The fact that so many seem to tolerate "low-res" or "mid-res" displays on the current M-series Macs is really puzzling to me... maybe my eyesight isn't as bad as I thought it was and everyone else's is a lot worse!?<p>This new M4 mini is tempting enough that I might try a Mac again... but this time I am definitely going to have to budget for a 4k/5k display.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988919</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988919</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988919</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Why Is .US Being Used to Phish So Many of Us?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a shame that the .us locality namespace and delegated manager infrastructure has been allowed to languish. GoDaddy (and Neustar previously) have intentionally made it difficult or impossible to register new locality domains under namespaces managed by them (read: the majority of namespaces).<p>The delegated manager system truly represented the distributed, decentralized nature of the old Internet. That said, it is not completely dead; there are still a handful of delegated managers out there, and you can even convince some of them to "register" a new domain for you in the locality namespace!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37353633</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37353633</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37353633</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogcow in "Update from Fastmail on the Australian policing law and privacy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doesn't matter - Fastmail's response is just PR bunk.<p>Two big isues:<p>- Fastmail pays taxes to the Australian government. By supporting Fastmail, you are supporting this lunacy indirectly.<p>- Their rebuttal revolves around requiring a warrant for any of this, but what good is that if the process if flimsy and there is basically no friction/verification involved in obtaining a warrant?<p>I am a long time customer and I love Fastmail's service. But Australia has just gone nuts, and I think this is the last straw. I'll be working on a plan to slowly migrate elsewhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2021 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28416758</link><dc:creator>dogcow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28416758</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28416758</guid></item></channel></rss>