<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dogprez</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dogprez</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 08:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dogprez" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "All AI Videos Are Harmful (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not trying to detract from the OP's point but if the author turned the lens they are using to evaluate whether AI videos are harmful or not onto the videos one usually encountered on the internet pre-AI videos, I think they would find most internet videos are harmful by those same metrics.  It's propaganda, rage-baiting, trying to manipulate you into buying something, etc.  It's no wonder that's the sort of content we see being generated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46502124</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46502124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46502124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "OpenAI charges by the minute, so speed up your audio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Others pointed out the value of silence, but I just wanted to say it saddens me when humanity is misclassified as inefficiency.  The other day Sam Altman made a jest about how much energy is wasted by people saying "thanks" to chatgpt.  The corollary is how much human energy is wasted on humans saying thanks to each other.  When making a judgement about inefficiency one is making a judgement on what is valuable, a very biased judgement that isn't necessarily aligned with what makes us thrive. =) (<-- a wasteful smiley)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44388493</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44388493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44388493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Show HN: Evolved.lua – An Evolved Entity Component System for Lua"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What makes it an "envolved" ecs?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44054096</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44054096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44054096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Migrating away from Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it's a good point and I experienced the same thing when playing with SDL3 the other day.  So even established languages with new API's can be problematic.<p>However, I had a different takeaway when playing with Rust+AI.  Having a language that has strict compile-time checks gave me more confidence in the code the AI was producing.<p>I did see Cursor get in an infinite loop where it couldn't solve a borrow checker problem and it eventually asked me for help.  I prefer that to burying a bug.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:35:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43825808</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43825808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43825808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Avoiding outrage fatigue while staying informed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I tried that with work. I created an account where I can just follow a few things related to my job.  The problem is that reddit will start showing you things you didn't subscribe to.  It's a battle to keep them at bay.  If you look at my work account feed it's all mycology, bad tattoos, what-is-this-thing.  I never subscribed to any of them.  Yea, they are interesting but that's not what I wanted or need at work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42964494</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42964494</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42964494</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're right, but I don't think giving a dollar to gifted programs instead of intervention for struggling kids solves that problem. In fact if a kid is gifted but is struggling because of household issues, again, the money is better spent on struggling kids and they'll benefit from it.<p>There are a lot of reasons a kid may be struggling in school and it doesn't mean they are dumb or their future is worthless, as your hypothetical kids shows.  I live in an area with one of the top public schools in America, they have a well funded gifted program. I know several parents whose dyslexic children are not getting the support they need.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42250345</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42250345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42250345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I appreciate what you are trying say. I'm having a hard time believing it because I was one of those kids.  The only thing my parents gave me was access to books, technology, love and free time.  They possessed zero experience in engineering or technology, gave zero guidance.  In fact they told me I was wasting my time being on the computer so much.  I think people like to inject themselves as some sort of necessary mentor but gifted kids are gifted.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42249434</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42249434</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42249434</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Or by disrupting the rest of the class.<p>Kids that are struggling in class can be just as disruptive.<p>> Gifted kids in a single stream classroom need to learn to play dumb or become a social pariah.<p>Aka learn to function in society?<p>Here's my story from the other side. I have one gifted child and one child with dyslexia, but doesn't qualify for special education. My school district has a gifted program that is a whole separate school, but they have a handful of specialists to help kids struggling to read.  They are shared across the grades and hard to get assigned. One of them has to actually be paid for by the PTSA since the district won't pay for it. That's messed up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:56:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42248047</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42248047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42248047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's just the truth. Look at the boeing dreamliner failures. Hundreds of smart people doing a bang up job. It just took one a few missteps to jeopardize the whole production and peoples lives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247917</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247917</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247917</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't believe it. Almost every kid in America has access to the internet, a public library and a teacher. How many don't have access to any of those? That's a different problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247896</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This is definitely not true for poorer gifted students:<p>I don't think that's as big of an issue because kids have access to teachers, libraries and the internet.<p>> Gathering gifted kids together, instead of bunching them with lowest common denominators, can result in lifelong friendships.<p>Kid's together creates the opportunity for friendships. Focusing too much on academics at a young age will miss key milestones for social development. It's particularly acute for high functioning autistic kids.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247883</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "California's most neglected group of students: the gifted ones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>She makes some good points, but my take is that we in the 21st century are more bound to the success of our weakest links.  Our world has become so complicated, one small mistake can have dire consequences.  So, it's the state's priority to spend its limited resources helping those struggling to tread water.  Gifted children will get the stimulus they need at home via independent study or from their family.  I know since I gave myself an almost complete college education in computer science before I graduated from high school.  Splitting gifted kids apart can warp them socially for life too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:17:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247609</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42247609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "New research on anesthesia and microtubules gives new clues about consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If anything, it appears that neural networks are far further along than any quantum mechanism for approximating whatever "consciousness" actually is? And neural networks are absolutely not quantum mechanical.<p>Neural networks are also way less power efficient.  Quantum computing allows us to calculate things that would take a lot of power or time to calculate (not calculate things that are impossible).  If one could create consciousness with classical physics it wouldn't prove anything about how the human brain works.  In fact if it was wildly less power efficient it might even suggest non-classical physics in the brain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 18:57:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41700695</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41700695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41700695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Swift 6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> happens more at runtime<p>Bingo, that's the difference.  That's why I said "compile-time memory safety".  This is what Rust gives you for your trouble, zero (runtime) cost for memory safety.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:32:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41597031</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41597031</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41597031</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Swift 6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, sorry, it's not <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.8.0/book/references-and-borrowing.html" rel="nofollow">https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.8.0/book/references-and-borrowin...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 04:02:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41575667</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41575667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41575667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Swift 6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm glad you found something you like.  I just want to make it clear that the things about Rust that make it "unfriendly" are also the things that make it able to do things other languages can't do, like compile-time memory safety.  Depending on what you are making, that might make little difference.  I just wanted to make sure you appreciated what Rust can do that other languages can't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41573759</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41573759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41573759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "GPU synchronization in Godot 4.3 is getting a major upgrade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The order of execution of the recorded commands inside a command buffer is NOT guaranteed to complete in the order they were submitted: the GPU can reorder these commands in whatever order it thinks is best to complete the job as quickly as possible.<p>It's my understanding that commands inside of a command buffer are guaranteed to complete in order.  The synchronization must happen when you are `vkQueueSubmit`ing multiple command buffers, no?  I think that's what they meant to say?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:44:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39403383</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39403383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39403383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "Gemini can't show me the fastest way to copy memory in C# because it's unethical"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Imagine being a researcher from the future and asking this same question of the AI.  The safety concern would be totally irrelevant, but the norms of the time would be dictating access to knowledge.  Now imagine a time in the not too distant future where the information of the age is captured by AI, not books or films or tape backups, no media that is accessible without an AI interpreter.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 22:22:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39321223</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39321223</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39321223</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "A Tour of the Lisps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fennel has a form `assert-repl` which will drop into the REPL wherever, if the condition fails.  For writing games you can launch the REPL in the game loop if a keyboard button is pressed.  But what you can't do, that I know of, is interrupt arbitrary execution and get a Fennel REPL.  You'd probably need a lua debugger of some sort for that.  I'm not that familiar with that though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:19:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185644</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dogprez in "A Tour of the Lisps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> [Fennel] also lacks Common Lisp's debuggability, given that it sits entirely within Lua's runtime.<p>I'm not sure exactly what feature the OP was referring to.  It sounds like they don't think you can get a REPL for an executing Fennel process?  You can.  If you are only using it for AOT Fennel->Lua you can't, you have to include its runtime.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39184807</link><dc:creator>dogprez</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39184807</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39184807</guid></item></channel></rss>