If every user of an LLM took this much care and attention, many people would have fewer issues with LLM assisted coding. In this case the author has demonstrated they can write plenty of code without an LLM, so why not use it carefully to benefit their productivity?

I also don’t get the focus on handling DHCP renewals in the kernel fast path. With 2000 subscribers per OLT and say a 5 minute lease time that’s only a few renewals a second.

The Redis test suite is still written in Tcl: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9963162 (although more recently antirez said somewhere he wished he'd written it in C for speed)

It’s also vague as, what if I run a VPS provider and someone can upload images to a marketplace like thing, does that count as SaaS? How about if someone’s only use of my services is to run that image?

Steer clear unless you want to open yourself up to the copyright owners opinion changing. (See for example the pine email client and the copyright discussions there.)

This kind of thing annoys me. This is why CTFs are great, where the goal is to get the flag string. Obviously harder to do for sysadmin, but expecting a particular configuration when I managed to make it work without doing things exactly as they wanted is no better than a poorly written exam.

Basically you end up with something not legally enforceable. And will someone actually doing evil care about your license?

Not at all. Put the LAN interface in a network namespace that is different to the host (ip link set ... netns ...).

This gives you your "kill switch" without even needing firewall rules, it happens on a lower level.

The whole thing is AI slop. I thought there might be something interesting here but it's just a bunch of disconnected fragments of OpenWRT config and some other bits without any overall thought.

It doesn't even use network namespaces. You can probably do better by giving your LLM https://www.wireguard.io/netns/ as input.