This happened because the ease of obtaining lab-grown diamonds that could be much higher quality, made lab-grown diamonds more attractive because buyers, who may already have been squeezed by other unfavorable economic realities found no reason to purchase natural diamonds at a higher price point.

If we could see a shift like that in energy source preference from one generation then perhaps we could destroy the incentive to produce more oil and gas or make it so uneconomical for use a motor vehicle fuel that it became a specialty product that was produced only to supply a niche product line.

We have a similar opportunity now with electric vehicles, solar panels, battery storage, etc that we can make a large dent in the volume of crude oil and natural gas required to power our economies. Developing nations have an advantage in a way because they have less legacy infrastructure to support that requires oil and gas. They can adopt the new big thing and just roll with that saving their citizens lots of money and environmental consequences associated with use of hydrocarbons fuels.

More than 35 years in the oil and gas industry. This is what I learned.

We should invest in developing nations to bring them up to speed with best available technologies. If we waste too much time we will see continents like Africa with 56 (?) nations become a flash-point for the next round of resource wars (oil and gas conflicts) that will be pushed on them by foreign operators attempting to make as much of the O&G money as possible before the world gets the message and abandons their destructive products permanently. We are already seeing some of this today. Millions of lives are in the crossfire. We have an opportunity to make a difference and we should take it. Old and young in developed nations should adopt next-gen tech ASAP so that kill these dino-corps before they kill too many more of us.

This leaves the oil and gas industry with a clear disadvantage and begins to tie their survival to maintenance of local advantages. That means they are incentivized to spend lots of money to preserve the status quo where they could be spending that money to pivot to a better world for all. As the market for their product condenses to a few developed nations with compliant leaders they will soak users even more so that profits can be maintained while they fund propaganda campaigns to improve their public image.

All subsidies currently designated for energy infrastructure should be focused on sustainable sources of energy and any monies currently dispersed to the oil and gas industry should be clawed back so that the damages already done and in progress can be partly remediated by the ones who caused it.

I read all of that text. When I got to the part about their mouthwash (rinse) I found xylitol hyped as part of the disinfection regime. Xylitol was just tagged, again, in the literature as a source of cardiac issues and notes were that it was a common ingredient in chewing gum and mouthwash. The risks have been known for several years as documented here [0]. A recent article is this one [1]

After reading all of this I feel like Dyson should consider modifying the composition of their mouthwash to reduce the risk of users ingesting xylitol during or after this process. There are other synthetic sweeteners, each with its own set of problems but xylitol was commonly employed because it had antibacterial effects on bacteria that are known to cause gingivitis. Its use in chewing gum and in some foods probably caused most of the exposure events for people looking at healthier options for common items. Most people don't swallow mouthwash or toothpaste but there will always be some remaining in the mouth that is flushed into the system after brushing.

I checked their "Caveats and Sources" section at the end of the article. If you notice, there are 10 items in that list. When you read the article, there are only 8 tags linking to the Caveat list. Numbers 9 and 10, both related to MyDyson app (9) and claims associated with Dyson mouthwash and how the comparison was made (10) are not found in the text.

I find the whole device intriguing. Anything to simplify the tooth maintenance process and improve it works for me. I like that they attacked the tooth gap issue in an effort to minimize the need for mechanical flossing. I'm not sold on cameras on a toothbrush but if it works, I could be though I do not want a device like this to be connected to any other device that could have access to outside networks. It all needs to work in a self-contained system at point-of-use with data leakage, ever. Dyson doesn't need to learn to improve their devices by aggregating my teeth-brushing activity with that from millions (or thousands, or hundreds if it ever happens) of users. Pay people to participate. Use that data.

[0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38842092/

[1] https://www.escardio.org/news/press/press-releases/xylitol-m...

I like this project. I have been using security cams around my place to keep track of animals meandering across the property. It's the best use for an outdoor solar-powered webcam if you ask me. You can get a feel for which animal to expect based on time of day or other characteristics. You also recognize those who regularly visit. I have a one-eyed raccoon that has been showing up for almost two years now. It's a female and the last time she visited the monitored fountain she had 5 rambunctious raccoonlets.

The problem is that the money that could be used is being applied to the wrong problem or is being siphoned off by those whose only goal is accumulation of money since that accumulation might guarantee more power in the process of selecting how to direct the next cash infusion, which they also hope to accumulate.

A few years later, before the cat/pecker group could complete their service yourself station, the stronger group herded them out of the area forcing them on the road to new lands, new experiences and opportunities for personal growth - of the whole body instead of just parts.

And now you know why I am not much of an archaeologist. I get a little tired of every polished rock being something someone worshiped though it looks like for these people that probably fits.

Maybe the ones who built this site went to the Spanish/French border and are the ancestors of the Basques, who have a unique language. I'm not the guy to answer that question.

If I wanted to identify this group's descendants among modern people I would look for people who have a deep connection to cats like the ones depicted in their monuments.

And now you know why I am not much of an archaeologist. I get a little tired of every polished rock being something someone worshiped though it looks like for these people that probably fits.

The first scavengers or predators on the scene will evaluate your condition and attack the softer parts of your body. That includes your anus and genital area, your stomach/gut area, your eyes and neck. It is in your best interest to cover those areas as best as possible. Those animals will try to create injuries that are serious enough that you will not survive so they go for the soft parts.

Buzzards are known to start at the anus/genital area and move into the gut area. when they are cleaning a carcass. Same with larger prey animals. Use your resources and energy to protect the soft parts and you will improve your chances of survival. Duck and cover by assuming a fetal position can work if you can maneuver your backside into a sheltered position where it is less accessible. Cover your ass in other words. When fighting back you should remain facing the threat with your rear covered.

Something came along and compelled these people to abandon the site or they were killed off by a different group. Very interesting anyway why a group would put so much effort into constructing these sites without the sites being places where they lived. I think I read somewhere that there is no evidence to suggest that anyone ever lived there. They were places where people gathered. I could be wrong though.