You can fly a drone on your own land. You can wear meta glasses on your land. I don't give a shit about that.

What I am saying is that if you want to wear the glasses in public, get a permit otherwise the camera or any geo-tracking features should be disabled.

It should be traceable to who wears these. I don't want to be filmed in public by some creep with a hidden recording device as to the likes of public not wanting hobbyist drones flown over their head.

You may act responsibly with them and that's great, but I doubt those do. Unfortunately that drags you in to the mix and others who use them legitimately too.

Unless they who wear the glasses tell me why they're wearing the glasses I will make association that you're in the same crowd. You stated you don't, so I believe you.

I would hope the same that I am trusted after proven and not trusted until known.

We all should be able to trust each other but that's not case in todays world.

The camera should be disabled until you obtain a permit.

Drones require a license and agreement to fly, these should be too.

I do not board a plane to be discreetly recorded by a pair of glasses. It's creepy and just privacy invasive.

What shows is that the old stigma of programming held everything back and most of that was Oracle. Still the same today with Google, Facebook and so.

Java Applets were phenomenal and way ahead of their time. It just got caught up in the swamp and broadband wasn't available to enable the technology to flourish. I never loathed them, I loved them. 3D graphics in the browser; we still struggle with that today.

Everything back then was a pain but is anything easier now? Tried using Windows 11? Even Linux has lost its charm.

WebGL isn't mature enough and Apple is cutting OpenGL from their OS. Where is the HTML5 equivalent of Flash? I have yet to see it other than Ruffle.

If the plugins were adopted, and browsers were adaptable to the plugins that would decuffed the browser rather than the current trend of the internet where the schematics are now vastly dominated and ruled by Google & co cuffing the browser and any other future browser for that matter in to nose dive spiral.

Firefox is the only major alternative and is only floundering because of Google.

If plugins were the browser from the get-go then any shift of plugins could rock the boat.

> Are you saying that the native browser APIs evolving to make Flash obsolete is a bad thing?

Pretty much yes. HTML 5 was Googles push for dominance, JavaScript was too. Not sure if intentionally but they sure at it now. "Don't be evil" I seem to recall.

Without it's merits, it would too have it's own problems but I would wager that the internet ecosystem would be broader and more united than what it is now.

Extensions don't count as it's difficult to use another programming language in the browser unless it's tied to WASM or built in. And even then you're further restricted where features are torn out.

Adblockering in chrome et cetera. 1999.

It would of been glorious having any programming language usable within the browser. Craft your own features rather than what's given to you now. It's only now that we're gaining the ability to use other languages via WASM.

Tcl was a contender to Javascript in the browser but Javascript won because it didn't require a plugin. And as Tcl never became the browser's default scripting environment juxtaposition Flash eventually lost because the browser platform evolved to make its proprietary plug-in unnecessary

I wouldn't say poor. Adobe had its own creative-software empire to up-keep. Photoshop, Illustrator, After Effects, and its web-authoring products gave it enormous influence over creative professionals. Macromedia's Dreamweaver and Flash were serious competitors in web design and interactive media. Adobe needed the missing monopoly cards; Flash, Fireworks and Dreamweaver were them.

Flash was security ridden yes, Flash required a plugin, yes; I don't think supported AppleOS at the time. These could of all been solved but I would agree that to refactor the software would of been an expensive take.

Jobs + HTML5, WebGL, JS all had entered the ring and finished the blow.

I miss it. Growing up with the internet in 2003, 2010's was the end of the wild world web. 2020's was the era of walled gardens for which we now have LLM's for the theme park and we're now entering 2030 where the internet is on fire with creativity now wrung between Yes Ai and No Ai.

    Domain name:
        lordsephiroth.co.uk

    Relevant dates:
        Registered on: 18-Nov-2003

Unfortunately I had to kick him in the testicles. Not too hard, around a 6-7.

On second thought of judgement I realised he's not nice and a very fraudulent person.

If you want proof I'll send you my trainer I kicked him with. Just include your mailing address below. Real story. Reals.

If you can't provide a mock sample of a predefined template or example, I don't want to use it.

Not sure what you can't grasp.

You can't wonder when the man offering the wonder is a man of fraud. It's 2026 and we are now spiralling in to a pit of despair with no return.

Elon shows no care to the world or you. It sounds like you have fallen hold to his playbook of a new shiny toy you'll probably never own outright.

We have wars going on killing innocent people and then have a man who disables Starlink.

A man who raided your country, America. Sabotaging jobs of hard workers, important folk and ruining their lives. Does that not matter now for which we should forget the governmental damage caused due to his "DOGE" antics?

There is no wonder in fracking, cruelty to animals or destruction of planetary resources.

You know he fracks right and know that his brain-chip has tortured innocent animals?

That is all fine if folk want to live in fantasy land, I do not. I want to live in a functioning real land.

You want wonder? I've been wondering when humanity will actually work together and improve society but that's just wishing upon a dying star.

His toys and vision do not align with mine and his fraud outweighs any ingenuity that may come from.

You want to know something else? He's not even American, he's South African.

If you're a democratic voter and you buy this car, you're no worse than the republican president. You might as well vote for republican seeing as you are supporting a fraudulent South African republican reality.

I am English who lives in the United Kingdom. If you wanted an outside in perspective you got one.

For what? For an unpractical vehicle that now has the ability to launch and crush another car? If said to be true. As if driving wasn't already dangerous and stupid enough.

If he would show maturity for a change rather than his childhood antics then I would give him credit.

Dislike the design, look and edge of it. Feels cold. Each to their own.

Good job, I'm not touching this again.

The BBC knew this but covered it up. Jimmy Savile was the main vile person in the case but it was later revealed that many of children's TV presenters had inappropriately conducted child abuse.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yewtree

The manager not so.

I got rehired due to the lack of staff and got put on entertainment. Guitar Hero had just came out and I got called up by their parents complaining for not letting their son win.

The store was on the skirts of a rich area which encouraged a lot of rich entitled parents.

Other antics were in the bike isle where I let a kid ride a bike who then rode it in to the board-game shelf. I didn't get rehired the next Christmas.

Good times.