That being said -- my agents only email each other and me! AgentMail is an OK start with the human <-> agent requirement, but consider that is a whitelist of a single email. The feature for AgentMail should be: we let your agent sign up easily for an email, and it has a very limited list of addresses and domains it can send outgoing email. This is very unlike normal email! I actually can't think of a single (human-facing) provider that will enable me to blacklist domains at the mailserver level to prevent outgoing mail from going to forbidden destinations.

Allowing a bot/agent to send email to any domain, with only a tagline to indicate the bot, is spam. But -- just like sandboxing the network and CLI commands available to the agent on my Mac Mini -- sandboxing an agent's email would just be the smart thing to do.

Pivot to an agent email sandbox and you will get plenty of the right kinds of customers, who won't ruin your mailserver reputation. Provide some easy agent-friendly whitelists out-of-the-box like same-custom-domain, and a similar approval system for new addresses/domains built on your OTP setup.

Tow floats are common in all open water swimming, e.g. triathlons.

Also those aren’t fire hydrants

Are you suggesting a solution for this situation?

Most bad actors are looking for easy targets and will move on when seeing minimal defenses. If we want to continue enjoying an open and accessible internet where any client that speaks the protocol can connect, then WAFs are an integral part of maintaining that public service.

Unfortunately as of a few years ago Google TV/Android TV forces ads for useless content in the home screen, taking up bandwidth and slowing load times. The 'dumb' Chromecasts can still talk to the AVR over HDMI-CEC to turn on power, adjust volume, etc.

https://github.com/livebassmusicrightnow/even-nicercast/blob...

https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-icy

WASM would be total overkill. The mpeg stream is readable natively in the browser — that’s how I served the client when I was running livebassmusicrightnow.

The design and high quality materials were worth it to me for the same reasons you wanted this design — it is functional art and doesn’t look out of place next to my other quality items I see and use daily.

I could see paying $120 for this dock. I bet this is the kind of thing that would succeed on Kickstarter. Sure, I could print and assemble it myself but that would cost me more than $120 in parts and labor.

I’d be much more interested to see either:

- a robot trained on experienced clothing retail sales associates (can fold a shirt like this in a single movement), or

- a non-human folding technique optimized for the robot arms (having multiple fingers and more arm+hand mobility is part of what makes the human single-move fold possible).

Source: Have worked at Gap, Nordstrom, others…

I’m skeptical of many carbon capture solutions, but this presentation isn’t doing itself any favors. It shouldn’t cite generalized articles, or articles from the same website. It should be citing facts and studies.