If someone is willing to sell their vote in the first place, they have zero incentive to vote for another candidate. They only have to trust the buyer to follow up on his promise (which is required in any other scenario also).

This is only true as long as you are not able to weigh the quality of a source. Just like getting spam in your inbox may waste your time, but it doesn't make you dumber.

1. add a message box stating that it is experimental and has only a very small set of companies right now

2. add an option to get notified when you have a more complete dataset (just use a Google form to collect email addresses)

Reason: Searched for my company, no result, ok, we're too small. Searched for some DAX companies, no results either => site looks broken.

Additional ideas:

* Add information from insolvenzbekanntmachungen.de, it's a major PITA to find someone there * Provide a (paid) API so it can be integrated into shop systems etc.

A Creditreform membership is quite expensive, probably worth it for larger shops, but for small enterprise your solution might come in handy.

There is, however, one big disadvantage one should be aware of, and that is downtime. There will be downtime when you

* push a new version of your project

* install package updates for docker, postgres, ...

* install a new kernel and need to reboot

* need to upgrade the base OS because you can't stay on Ubuntu 16.04 for the next 10 years (this one can take hours)

Of course there are projects which can live with that. If your target audience is 9-5 office workers, some downtime at night might be acceptable. At least if you don't have customers in other timezones.

IMHO, the sweet spot would be to have two identical servers with automatic failover, but I did not find a good solution for that yet. Would be very interested if someone here has a solution for that and is willing to share.

2022: 491,8 TWh 2023: 436,8 TWh

So Germany is not replacing fossil fuels with renewables, it just produces less electricity overall. Which might be caused by the fact that electricity is so expensive nowadays, that especially energy-intensive industries are getting less and less economical, so they lower their production or even shut down completely and move elsewhere.

Actually, I'm not even sure the AI companies don't do this already. If I'd start such a company, I'd invest in a generic crawler once, instead of building countless integrations for all the different, proprietary APIs or dump formats.

1.) They got identity right. In nostr, your identity is a key pair, which is not bound to a server like in the fediverse (e.g. Mastodon, Lemmy).

2.) They got decentralization right. Everything in nostr is a signed message, published to one or more relays. Since relays don't do anything more but store and forward signed messages, they can easily be replaced without losing your identity or data. Also, no blocking drama ("fediblock").

3.) They got extensibility right. Since signed messages are the only building block, and clients are only views over messages, new functionality can be added unilaterally. Just write a new client, and everyone can use it instantly with the existing identity and data - zapddit is a good example.

What's missing yet are moderated groups and an algorithm to sort your feed. But this can (and probably will) be implemented at any time by anyone, and there can (and probably will) be competing implementations, which is a big plus IMHO.

There is simply no way to suppress content as long as there's enough demand. Somebody's always going to find a way to deliver. That's even true for really illegal stuff like drugs, copyright infringement or child abuse material, but so much more for content which is legal.

It's not a replacement for Docker, but a very useful companion.

That method does not work very well for e.g. weed.