<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: drpixie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=drpixie</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=drpixie" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "I'm not anti-AI, but I have QUALLMS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Their basic point is very valid, and the term "AI" is now so overused that it's become essentially meaningless.<p>Recently I've heard "AI" used to mean:<p>* using large language models for code/text/image generation<p>* goal-driven search of a problem space<p>* pattern extraction from images<p>* algorithmic decision making<p>* audio pattern recognition<p>* something (unspecified) using lots of computers<p>* and more trivially, "doing it on a computer"!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:31:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49251738</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49251738</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49251738</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Let the machines in"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LLMs have shown us how easily humans are fooled. Just provide a similar answer to which was seen in similar circumstances, and we start misleading ourselves into it's method and "understanding".<p>Though perhaps I'm wrong that people use a model of the world to think through answers to queries. Maybe many people do just repeat something like whatever they heard before. In which case, LLMs make as much sense as the average ignorant human.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:29:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49149845</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49149845</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49149845</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's been amusing to watch the points bounce up and down on my comment.<p>I guess equally half the readers agree with my sentiment, and half down-vote, being upset by my attitude to the AI industry :)<p>PS. I'm quietly waiting for the bubble to pop - the main interest being will it pop with a bang and cause grief to many, or will it just go with a long drawn-out fart that can be ignored by most.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:51:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886536</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886536</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886536</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture<p>Very misleading article title.<p>Title should be "Un-named humans produce unverified proof of CDC Conjecture using GPT-5.6" ... but I expect only advertising copy when it comes from the AI industry.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 02:51:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868209</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868209</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868209</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "One KW wind turbine without civil engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is there anything on the website that isn't "AI" generated? Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear :(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:51:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754668</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "One KW wind turbine without civil engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can't imagine it would survive the first descent storm. Unlike conventiolnal turbines, it doesn't seem to have any way of protecting itself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754649</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754649</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754649</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "All of human cooking compressed into 2 megabytes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Few thousand? Really? Larousse Gastronomique is 3600 pages, averaging maybe 1 recipe and 1 ingredient per page - and that's just classic French cooking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 05:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304810</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "A fundamental principle of aeronautical engineering has been overturned"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Me too. The number of "revolutionary" designs that are announced but disappear makes me cynical. Looking wings on real aircraft, unless freshly painted, they're pretty close to finely sanded :) If the airlines and engineers saw a significant performance degradation with wear, they'd be out there polishing and repainting wings.<p>On a similar note - How many times have you seen announcements about someones blended wing that is going to save 50% fuel? But there are very few blended wings in nature (eg. rays), and those are in a very slow-speed regime.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 02:14:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262837</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262837</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262837</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Google broke reCAPTCHA for de-googled Android users"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm inclined towards keeping an ancient android for those apps that require it, and maybe something open for actual use. Or perhaps a crappy old android for android and a small non-android tablet/laptop for daily-driver stuff, which always works better as a computer anyway!<p>I'm also becoming open to using software that lies to google about what it is :)  Google will treat us like sh*t, why shouldn't we reciprocate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:58:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070682</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070682</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070682</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Google broke reCAPTCHA for de-googled Android users"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same reason as "make another (better) windows" is very difficult - almost everyone wants to be able to run existing apps and drivers, so you're forever playing compatibility catchup with android (or windows).<p>That's the reason companies are desperate to be first/biggest - once you're it, you're it until you finally fall on your face and dwindle to a nobody.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:53:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070648</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070648</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070648</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "What can we gain by losing infinity?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've always felt that to treat infinity as number is to commit a category error (aka type conflict), to confuse the process with the outcome of the process. Infinity has proven to be very useful, but usefulness doesn't make it always valid.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:28:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47956956</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47956956</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47956956</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Replacing an Apple Time Capsule? Skip the Ubiquiti UNAS-2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a great pity but I won't be buy more Ubiquiti hardware unless their direction improves. I loved the Ubiquiti hardware until a year or so ago. It was well spec'd, well priced, reliable, and it was easy to upgrade to OpenWrt. (Changing to OpenWrt was definitely an upgrade - get away from their you-must-do-it-our-way software. OpenWrt isn't perfect but mostly just works.)<p>But Ubiquiti have changed. The new hardware is silly - little screens and do-everything-on-an-app-with-our-cloud firmware. It's my infrastructure, I don't want to rely on your cloud! I only hope they go back to making good hardware and letting us use it for what we want.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 01:23:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906408</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906408</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906408</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Replacing an Apple Time Capsule? Skip the Ubiquiti UNAS-2]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/04/24/unas/">https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/04/24/unas/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906389">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906389</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 01:20:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2026/04/24/unas/</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Alberta startup sells no-tech tractors for half price"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>> However, the tech exists for a reason and is not inherently bad, the issue is the lock-in, the lack of choice and interoperability.<p>The marketing excuse for the tech might be features or efficiency, but the <i>reason</i> for the tech is lock-in and minimising product lifetime.<p>The days when manufacturers had friendly, cooperative relationships with their customers are long gone :(  Can we bring them back?  I hope so, but am not hopeful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871016</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47871016</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "IPv6 traffic crosses the 50% mark"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>> It has barely hit 50% and it's already plateauing.<p>Well, the curve has got to level-out at 100%.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:12:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790131</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "10% of Firefox crashes are caused by bitflips"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From Corsair<p>>> DDR5 technology comes with an exclusive data-checking feature that serves to improve memory cell reliability and increase memory yield for memory manufacturers. This inclusion doesn't make it full ECC memory though.<p>"Proper" ECC has a wider memory buss, so the CPU emits checksum bits that are saved alongside every word of memory, and checked again by the CPU when memory is read. Eg. a 64 bit machine would actually have 72 bit memory.<p>DDR5 "ECC" uses error correction only within the memory stick. It's there to reduce the error rate, so otherwise unacceptable memory is usable - individual cells have become so small that they are not longer acceptably reliable by themselves!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:44:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269291</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269291</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47269291</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "How many chess games are possible?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As I understand it, the 50-move rule must be invoked by one of the players, lets assume our immortal players agree not to invoke that rule.<p>The 75-move rule is automatic, so that would be the limiting factor.<p>Note, that 75-move rule is only applicable after no pawn has moved or a piece has been captured. So our immortals can do a lot of shuffling things around.<p>I'm thinking that the number of moves of the longest game is going to be (16 pawns * 7 moves each + 16 pawns being captured + 14 other pieces each being captured, not the kings) * 75 moves for shuffling around = 10650 moves.<p>That's only 1 week at 1 move per minute! But given the permutations, it might take much longer to calculate the actual moves required to get to the end state :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:05:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46791983</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46791983</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46791983</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Luxury Yacht is a desktop app for managing Kubernetes clusters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Personally, I would like the name to be <i>somehow</i> related to the system. When I'm facing a stack of names and icons, make it easy for me.<p>Names without <i>some</i> connection to the thing are just more difficult. Maybe the name isn't descriptive - you can only have some many versions of ed, edit, edt, vedit, gedit, zed... I'm perfectly happy with puns and jokes - eric can be connected to (monty) python. It's the connection that makes it memorable. Even yacc and grep have some connection to the program.<p>I've been using Vivaldi browser for a while now, but neither the name nor icon have formed a natural connection to browsing for me. Same with Lazarus (an IDE), no obvious link (worse, it's nothing to do with raised from the dead). But "Bluefish Editor" at least tells me what it does, not a full description, but plenty.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:42:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46690794</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46690794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46690794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Luxury Yacht is a desktop app for managing Kubernetes clusters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And I though the arbitrary, non-mnemonic, unrelated-to-anything project/app names had got too much ... obviously we're way past that :(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:43:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46686547</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46686547</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46686547</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by drpixie in "Ideas are cheap, execution is cheaper"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To me, it looks like the whole article was generated by AI. Using slop to promote slop ;(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46641690</link><dc:creator>drpixie</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46641690</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46641690</guid></item></channel></rss>