In the case of companies, a benevolent dictatorship is fine because employees, customers and investors can all exit and find other companies. It's at the nation state level where you need more structural veto points. (Arguably true for towns/counties/states too, but you still have the right to exit so...)

Previously I was the spam cop for a big sender and saw up close all the ways our clients would try to weasel around it.

I'm building an identity verification platform for age verification. I set it up as a nonprofit because I think this is a public good that should be provided by governments. It's mostly a proof of concept right now. My long term goal is to get state DMVs using it (or something like it).

https://cardlessid.org

And of course governments attract hackers because they tend to not be up to date on security best practices.

A single abstraction layer on blockchains allows more developers and security experts to contribute and innovate.

I've always had questions about this. Did he not look at the senior leadership and get a sense if that's true?

Lofty.ai used crypto as the back end for their fractionalized property platform, but there is no mention of crypto. I used it to sell a portion of my rental property. Here's a video I made about the process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgPLXFwhZbY&t=2s

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45619566

Points: 2

# Comments: 8