It's bizarre that you don't consider that people first of all don't want to leave their country.

There is Yandex Browser [0] which is based on Chromium and exists since 2010. Its share in Russia is ~33% while Chrome has 42% of the market [1].

[0] https://browser.yandex.com/

[1] https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/all/russian-...

Besides arguing on the internet with strangers

Bureau 1440 is named so to evoke associations with Soviet era "design bureaux" which were behind USSR's achievements in technology, and with the Soviet satellite, which was the first in the world and made 1440 orbits around Earth.

The name of satellite constellation (Rassvet, meaning Down) is a play on early Soviet space programs' names - Voshod (Sunrise, like American Mercury) and Vostok (East, where the sun rises; was like American Gemini).

It might even work! Just kidding, it will work

[0] https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8533593

[1] https://t.me/radio_sputnik/85322

And enjoy feeling pain? Or you just understand but not really feel?

As I said, that's just a recent event that's fresh in my memory.

>killed in places like supermarkets

Oh, right, of course, all Ukrainian missiles that hit Russian civilians were off-target and all Russian missiles that hit Ukrainian civilians were targeting civilians. That's what western media and Ukrainian propaganda tells you

[0] https://t.me/milinfolive/168222

Then why is the birth rate in Europe is as bad as in Russia? And the birth rate in 3rd world countries is several times higher?

The first thing Ukrainian parliament did after the coup was repelling the law protecting Russian language[0] I recommend reading the whole article, it all went downhill from there.

>Even now you can speak Russian freely in Ukraine despite the war.

Now children are beating children in kindergarten for saying "hello" in Russian. [1]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy_in_Ukraine#Att...

[1] https://t.me/ASupersharij/14855

As for the treaty you could read other articles in that treaty[0] while you at it:

Article 6

Each High Contracting Party shall refrain from participating in, or supporting, any actions directed against the other High Contracting Party, and shall not conclude any treaties with third countries against the other Party. Neither Party shall allow its territory to be used to the detriment of the security of the other Party.

Article 7

If a situation arises which, in the opinion of one of the High Contracting Parties, poses a threat to peace, violates the peace or affects the interests of its national security, sovereignty or territorial integrity, it may propose to the other High Contracting Party that consultations on the subject be held without delay. The States shall exchange relevant information and, if necessary, carry out coordinated or joint measures with a view to overcoming the situation

Article 11

The High Contracting Parties shall, in their territory, take the necessary measures, including the adoption of appropriate legislative acts, to prevent and suppress any activities that constitute an incitement to violence or violence against individuals or groups of citizens, based on national, racial, ethnic or religious intolerance.

Article 12

The High Contracting Parties shall protect the ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious diversity of ethnic minorities in their territory and shall create conditions that encourage such diversity. Each High Contracting Party shall guarantee the right of persons belonging to ethnic minorities, individually or together with other persons belonging to ethnic minorities, freely to express, preserve and develop their ethnic, cultural, linguistic or religious diversity and promote and develop their culture without being subjected to any attempts to assimilate them against their will.

[0] https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/b7nedx/pdf

Maybe you should reread my first comment?

I'm not interested in arguing for the sake of arguing

You argue like you haven't seen it.

>just some the NATO members were positive

That's not true, the alliance itself gave the assurances.[0]

>the request was so unpopular

The polls consistently showed that, but it hadn't stopped Yuschenko from submitting the request.

>Russia's "security concerns": "if you subhumans don't do exactly what we say, we invade you and subjugate you, you are not a real country anyway".

And this dismissive attitude towards legitimate security concerns of Russia led to the current situation.

>This is the literal quote of what I said

You forgot to quote "Just like". "the US "midwifing" the coup in Ukraine in 2014" isn't "just like" what you wrote. Besides, you haven't even offered any sources for your statements. Is it because you blame Russia for anything you don't like?

[0] https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resource...

Looks like typical American election. What's your point?

>After the guy was poisoned

After he was poisoned (by Ukrainians, btw), he was elected the president of the Ukraine. Fast forward 4 years and his approval ratings were 2-4% [0]

>You should've linked [0] when you talk about Yushchenko, comrade.

I fail to understand what point you are trying to make by referring to an article about Ukraine stealing Russian gas and getting caught.

>Quid pro quo

The US installs pro-Western government and then it becomes neutral because of what?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_el...