Sorry Indians reading this for throwing shade at India, but I just want to point out that making 1 billion of people not poor is freaking hard.

At the very least they would wait until they cracked EUV and mass-produce the chips, and that is still 4-5 years away at the earliest.

- well-crafted system prompt that follows best practices

- good contextual reminder prompts (when an llm got stuck in an infinite loop and times out, forgets how to use tools, or needs recurring best practice reminders, etc)

- well-written ergonomic tools the llm can use (read/write files, read diffs, browse the internet, etc)

I dont think these are anything special. The deepest moat I can think of is, proprietary models can be specifically trained to use their proprietary harnesses, so they are more token-efficient and make less tool call and file editing mistakes.

However in my experience, I'm as comfortable working with my own homemade harness as with Claude Code, so I don't think it's a deep moat...

They're just system prompt composer, with some tool functions that the LLM can invoke. I've vibe coded my own in just one day.

Also if we're only judging whole communities by their toxic minorities, then... I'm so sorry Americans reading this, I've got some bad news for you, lol

What I'm trying to say is, it's best to try for yourself, and see if it fits your preferences, rather than letting others stop you from exploring.

I wouldn't even bother reading whatever they wrote.

If you're concerned about espionage then the only solution is host the models yourself, which again, only open-weight models like Deepseek enable you to do this.

Take electricity adoption for example, with your adage then it means unreasonable pro-electricity people vs unreasonable anti-electricity people. We know how this turns out, I don't see a lot of people joining the Amish.

It's okay to have strong opinions (be "unreasonable"), but in the end humanity as a whole (the "reasonable" people) will judge whether your opinion is a good one or not. Only time will tell.

I see no point in denying the technology, it's best to do what we humans do best: adapt with it.

I've read the article and to me it reads like a very angry rant, which is why I commented with something akin to "bro calm down"

While waiting for Claude to finish, we talked about our hobbies outside of work, and the same guy will go into deep details on how steroids and the HPG axis works, and even gave me a spreadsheet with several NCBI PubMed links on the topic.

I think we are all naturally be more creative and opinionated in things we are interested in.

Now the skill issue lies in whether your opinion is a good idea or not lol.

You can still do creative thinking while using AI as a powerful tool at your disposal.

Some mathematicians like Terence Tao are comfortable doing this, for example.

People work there, and it will have people's dramas and problems, like everywhere else: fraud, crime, jealousy, simple mistakes, etc.

Despite their imperfections, the reason people with power trust their consensus more is because they are a lot more useful than other groups of people.

If you reject this statement, you can start by joining the Amish, since virtually all modern technology is built on top of the scientific community's consensus and work.

You might be confusing the established big bang with the more speculative cosmic inflation model. They're very closely related.

You should start from beef industry.