>Which OEM do not provide this feature? This hardly quality as a legitimate usecase but rather as a shortcoming of the OEM.

I find this kind of attitude maddening. Although I assume they overlooked "advanced" because as soon as I read that, I knew this wasn't going to be something ever supported as a basic functionality. I get that many people will be fine with simple things but I hate being forced into them.

American voting systems are bad. Average Americans have minimal influence on the policy that's enacted[1]. I wonder if where you are from these don't apply as much, and you are used to having more control over what the government does.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error?...

[1] https://pnhp.org/news/gilens-and-page-average-citizens-have-...

1. you can't prescribe someone a fixed society

2. what constitutes "over prescription" is subjective, and some increase in prescriptions is to be expected in line with better knowledge and so ability to diagnose people who were previously missed

3. contrary to several other psychiatric medications, stimulants have a known MoA and consistently beat placebo

4. amphetamine taken recreationally is often in different forms and much higher doses than would be taken on prescription, by people who aren't in need. Things like sleep and anxiety can actually be improved by such prescriptions

Don't you see it's the same thing? Why can't you just admit to yourself how irrelevant it is and lose interest? I suppose you could use it just to read an article or two, but you're in the comments as well. The apps are just their Hacker News.

If it's addiction, it's addiction through exploitation.

The status dots are a part of animations in general, which they overuse, especially things like transform/scale on hover and hover effects on many many elements.

I think it's not simply borders but contrasting-color borders often with box shadows.

Wow. Roughly how many entries do you have and how do you handle updates? I'm often being asked to change passwords and of course create new login entries.

>sh.tcoin

in the censorship section is ironic? Doesn't seem to be fleshed out though

>I've already heard rumblings that KeepassXC is likely to be featured in a few industry presentations that highlight security challenges with passkey providers, the need for functional and security certification, and the lack of identifying passkey provider attestation (which would allow RPs to block you, and something that I have previously rallied against but rethinking as of late because of these situations).

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10407#iss...

They 100% will lock it down to "secure" options you cannot control. I suppose if there's any hope, it would maybe be the official keepass submitting to their demands, while keeping them easy to bypass with a recompile.

Do you mean you print the raw values to paper or some encoding that would let you reconstitute the file (some giant QR code or something?)?

The document there is laughable too, because KeepassXC is listed as "not performing User Verification" when it demands manual authorization per request. But this isn't good enough for the passkey people. Ultimately, I see any FOSS option being effectively banned from most services and all important ones. It's a parallel to how you must now be on Cloudflare's nice list or be banned from the majority of the internet.