<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: dwoosley</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dwoosley</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 21:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=dwoosley" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dwoosley in "There is minimal downside to switching to open models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The only reason I'm on HN right now reading this post is because the Anthropic's API is down... so there's another point for self hosted.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624789</link><dc:creator>dwoosley</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624789</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by dwoosley in "Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Calling vulnerabilities detected in code as part of a responsible disclosure program a "zero-day vulnerability" seems like marketing fluff. 0-days vulnerabilities would seem to imply this vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild, and if that's true, you weren't the first one to discover it...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303622</link><dc:creator>dwoosley</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303622</guid></item></channel></rss>