<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: earthdeity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=earthdeity</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=earthdeity" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by earthdeity in "GitLab announces workforce reduction and end of their CREDIT values"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On a similar note, Firefox doesn't support <input type="month">, which I was surprised to see (chrome landed it in 2012). I checked their issue tracker and... as you describe. Browsers are complex, of course, but they do stand out as a really glacial corner of the software world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:12:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109513</link><dc:creator>earthdeity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by earthdeity in "How to Attend Meetings"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While I agree a lot of information is conferred, most of it is not useful.
I'm quite a fan of not attending meetings where I don't get specifically invited (as in, directly, not as part of a group). This may or may not fly at a given organisation. Anyhow, my main learning has been that:<p>1. All truly important information will be repeated (in the form of tickets, slack messages, further meetings). Usually several times.<p>2. Most useful subordinate information (the kind that doesn't get repeated) only needs to be related to 1 person 80%+ of the time. It's vanishingly rare 3 or more people need some information that isn't ever repeated elsewhere.<p>The only really useful work in meetings is <i>making decisions</i>. This is an essential feature, but a big problem is often many "spectators" are invited (attendees without decision power or context). Being a pure spectator in a meeting is almost always completely pointless. Also, people like to make decisions/input so meetings are rife with bike shedding (most people have decision power + context for low importance items usually).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 01:22:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46116123</link><dc:creator>earthdeity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46116123</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46116123</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by earthdeity in "Denmark wants to push through Chat Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can go to any number of sites (here's a nice one <a href="https://webencrypt.org/openpgpjs/" rel="nofollow">https://webencrypt.org/openpgpjs/</a>), and encrypt a message. You can exchange public keys over any text channel. You can then send encrypted messages over that text channel. Anyone who really needs to send encrypted messages, trivially can. Of course, many criminals won't, but should we all sacrifice our privacy for such a pathetic measure of security?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 01:57:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45355393</link><dc:creator>earthdeity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45355393</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45355393</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by earthdeity in "Anime fans stumbled upon a mathematical proof"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's true, but over a relatively short timeframe, those archives have proven to be extremely ephemeral. I can recall multiple instances of feature rich, good quality searchable archive sites existing, improving, then one day vanishing with a huge amount of data, sometimes permanently. There's usually low redundancy and a reliance on an individual or two, who can cease keeping the data at a whim. Such archives don't monetise well, if at all. So it's a hobby project for someone. Over the last fifteen years a screenshot has proven incredibly more reliable than an archive link.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43286759</link><dc:creator>earthdeity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43286759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43286759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by earthdeity in "Nobody cares"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Probably because workers' protections are very strong in Jaan and it's close to impossible to fire people.<p>- You cannot fire your staff (easily)
- Rather than replace staff, you need to train them
- You also really want to engender a sense of loyalty, because anyone who is checked-out is dead weight you need to carry<p>I think the legal protections for employment are upstream of the working culture. Maybe it's a chicken and egg problem. But in terms of policy you could test this, and it makes sense the culture is just in alignment with the incentive structure. America has an "I've got mine" approach, which is efficient and good for businesses, but...
Employees (correctly) know they are replaceable and have a strictly profit/loss relationship with companies they work for. In that framework the risk/reward for a worker to be doing the minimum they need to earn their pay-check is pretty favourable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 01:47:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42719975</link><dc:creator>earthdeity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42719975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42719975</guid></item></channel></rss>