<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: efromvt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=efromvt</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=efromvt" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah the marginal cost of discovery going towards 0 (I mean, not there yet, but directionally) is the problem; it doesn't really matter if the agent isn't equivalent to a human artistic hand-crafted bug discovery if it can make it up on volume. Mass production of exploits!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:34:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690028</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690028</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690028</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Components of a Coding Agent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Should I read that as 'generic system'? Most hard data is with company internal evals, but for the well defined tasks externally it's been pretty easy to spin up a basic tool loop and validate. Did you have something in mind? [I don't necessarily count 'coding' as well-defined in the generic sense, so I suspect we're coming at this from different scopes re: the definition of 'LLMs somewhat deterministic and useful as tools']</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 03:26:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656645</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just like OpenAI's original moat, I don't think that's particularly durable. I've already seen plenty of people swing back to preferring codex, and it'll probably swap again with the next model drop. Openclaw is potentially better integrated with ChatGPT at this point because of the explicit subscription support.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656342</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656342</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656342</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Components of a Coding Agent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's pretty easy to get determinism with a simple harness for a well-defined set of tasks with the recent models that are post-trained for tool use. CC probably gets some bloat because it tries to do a LOT more; and some bloat because it's grown organically.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643461</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "I Quit. The Clankers Won"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven't heard this benefit for mentors clearly articulated before (probably just missed it), but definitely felt it - I guess it's a deeper version of how writing/other communication forces clarity/organization of thoughts because mentorship conversations are so focused on extracting the why as well as the what.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600543</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Slop is not necessarily the future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this is exactly the point though (maybe more of the link than of this comment) - a sufficiently good product by all external quality metrics is fine even if the code is written on one line in a giant file or some other monstrosity. As long as one black box behaves the same way as another in all dimensions, they are competitive. You can argue that internal details often point to an external deficiency, but if they don’t, then there is no competitive pressure.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594489</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "The first 40 months of the AI era"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've chose to embrace the silver lining where there is now business backing to prioritize all the devx/documentation work because it's easier to quantify the "value" because LLM sessions provide a much larger sample size than inconsistent new hire onboarding (which was also a one-time process, instead of per session).<p>I do think people are going way overboard with markdown though, and that'll be the new documentation debt. Needs to be relatively high level and pointers, not duplicate details; agents can parse code at scale much faster than humans.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 14:33:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563494</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563494</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563494</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Show HN: I put an AI agent on a $7/month VPS with IRC as its transport layer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The gemini models are fantastic for price but the naming scheme is ridiculous, I have to triple check it every time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:40:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543199</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Schedule tasks on the web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Inference costs at least seem like the thing that is easiest to bring down, and there's plenty of demand to drive innovation. There's a lot less uncertainty here than with architectural/capability scaling. To your point, tomorrow's commodity hardware will solve this for the demands of today at some point in the future (though we'll probably have even more inference demand then).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542958</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542958</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542958</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (March 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah I have a 'species' info table that's built by curating wikipedia and a few other sources and passing them through a structured LLM pipeline; ecological benefit; blooming season; native regions, etc. This is very much a 'rough cut' at the moment; I want to put more quality gates and evals in it. If you're interested in collaborating all the raw parquet datasets I have are in a public GCS bucket - happy to have them pulled in anywhere else!<p>DBH I'm doing for the "size" right now, though I'd love to figure out how to get canopy shape/size as well, and height where possible. (and then maybe proxy height a species level from DBH, since that's more common).<p>(apologies for belated response)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482386</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "How we give every user SQL access to a shared ClickHouse cluster"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually 100% agree with your for a new DBMS and share your frustration with vendor-specific features and lock-in. At that level, it's often actively counterproductive for insurgent DBs - ecosystem tooling needs more work to interface with your shiny new DB, etc - and that's why we always see anyone who starts with a non-standard SQL converge on offering ANSI SQL eventually.<p>I think an application that exposes a curated dataset through a SQL-like interface - so the dashboard/analytic query case described here - is where I think this approach has value. You actually don't want to expose raw tables, INFORMATION_SCHEMA, etc - you're offering a dedicated query language on top of a higher level data product offering, and you might as well take the best of SQL and leave the bits you don't need. (You're not offering a data<i>base</i> as a service; you're offering <i>data</i> as a service).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482344</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482344</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482344</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "We give every user SQL access to a shared ClickHouse cluster"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As long as you don't deviate too much from ANSI, I think the 'light sql DSL' approach has a lot of pros when you control the UX. (so UIs, in particular, are fantastic for this approach - what they seem to be targeting with queryies and dashboards). It's more of a product experience; tables are a terrible product surface to manage.<p>Agreed with the ecosystem cons getting much heavier as you move outside the product surface area.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 12:38:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466477</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466477</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47466477</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "The 100 hour gap between a vibecoded prototype and a working product"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is where I think we need better tooling around tiered validation - there's probably quite a bit you <i>can</i> run locally if we had the right separation; splitting the cheap validation from the expensive has compounding benefits for LLMs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47391469</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47391469</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47391469</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Show HN: How I Topped the HuggingFace Open LLM Leaderboard on Two Gaming GPUs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you found two disjoint sections that seemed positive on their own, did you try looping both separately in the same model? Wondering how localized the structures are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47327803</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47327803</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47327803</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (March 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh that's great!  I was finding fun tree collections and wanted to go see them - unfortunately not in SF so not likely - but your app has some nice data around me that I can check out! Are you primarily using OSM data?<p>I was thinking of a google maps kind of "here you are, here's your walking path of interesting trees" potentially, or something else that could tie the overview to the street experience - on the backlog!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 03:21:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304524</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304524</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304524</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (March 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had some ambitions of merging in other city tree data but hadn't gotten around to exploring it yet - NYC might be a good place to start!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 03:11:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304468</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304468</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304468</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (March 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A visual explorer for the trees of San Francisco.<p><a href="https://greenmtnboy.github.io/sf_tree_reporting/#/" rel="nofollow">https://greenmtnboy.github.io/sf_tree_reporting/#/</a><p>For all the places it's bad at, AI has been fantastic for making targeted data experiences a lot more accessible to build (see MotherDuck and dives, etc), as long as you can keep the actual data access grounded. Years of tableau/looker have atrophied my creativity a bit, trying to get back to having more fun.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304199</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Show HN: I built a real-time OSINT dashboard pulling 15 live global feeds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd be interested in just the data layer of this being extractable - will poke around at that. (frontend is fun, though!).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 20:49:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301297</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301297</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301297</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Show HN: Inconvo – open-source chat-with-data agent that doesn't generate SQL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A belated - nice to see this, I think an intermediate IR is the right way to gate access rather than raw SQL (full disclosure; also hacking on open-source solutions in that space) - how are you balancing expressiveness vs control? Some of the more impressive text to SQL demos rely on agents being able to do fairly complicated calculations - which it seems like IL could support - but I'm still seeing the IL example as containing some of the footguns they also hit - join type (inner/vs outer, group by etc). How are you balancing having enough safe moves to be useful, while not introducing unsafe combinations of moves?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:57:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223239</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47223239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by efromvt in "Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a lot of useful autonomous things that don't require unrestricted outbound communication, but agreed that the "safe" claw configuration probably falls quite a bit short of the popular perception of a full AI assistant at this point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47102395</link><dc:creator>efromvt</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47102395</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47102395</guid></item></channel></rss>